Defining and Scoping Participatory Health Informatics: An eDelphi Study

Author:

Denecke Kerstin1,Romero Octavio Rivera23,Petersen Carolyn4,Benham-Hutchins Marge5,Cabrer Miguel6,Davies Shauna7,Grainger Rebecca8,Hussein Rada9,Lopez-Campos Guillermo10,Martin-Sanchez Fernando11,McKillop Mollie12,Merolli Mark1314,Miron-Shatz Talya15,Trigo Jesús Daniel16,Wright Graham17,Wynn Rolf18,Hullin Lucay Cossio Carol192021,Gabarron Elia2223

Affiliation:

1. Bern University of Applied Sciences, Department Engineering and Computer Science, Institute for Medical Informatics, Bern, Switzerland

2. Instituto de Ingeniería Informática (I3US), Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain

3. Department of Electronic Technology, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain

4. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States

5. College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Texas A&M University Corpus Christi, Texas, Corpus Christi, United States

6. eHealth Expert and Idonia Founder, Mallorca, Spain

7. Faculty of Nursing, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada

8. Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand

9. Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria

10. Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom

11. Digital Health Programme, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

12. IBM Corporation, New York, United States

13. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

14. Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

15. Faculty of Business Administration, Ono Academic College, Kiryat Ono, Israel

16. Department of Electrical, Electronic and Communications Engineering, Public University of Navarra, Institute of Smart Cities (ISC), Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain

17. Department of Information Systems, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa

18. Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

19. Data Governance Manager, Victoria Legal Aid, Melbourne, Australia

20. College Economy & Business, The University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia

21. Digital Innovation Centre for Latinoamerican Region, Temuco, Chile

22. Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway

23. Department of Education, ICT and Learning, Østfold University College, Halden, Norway

Abstract

Abstract Background Health care has evolved to support the involvement of individuals in decision making by, for example, using mobile apps and wearables that may help empower people to actively participate in their treatment and health monitoring. While the term “participatory health informatics” (PHI) has emerged in literature to describe these activities, along with the use of social media for health purposes, the scope of the research field of PHI is not yet well defined. Objective This article proposes a preliminary definition of PHI and defines the scope of the field. Methods We used an adapted Delphi study design to gain consensus from participants on a definition developed from a previous review of literature. From the literature we derived a set of attributes describing PHI as comprising 18 characteristics, 14 aims, and 4 relations. We invited researchers, health professionals, and health informaticians to score these characteristics and aims of PHI and their relations to other fields over three survey rounds. In the first round participants were able to offer additional attributes for voting. Results The first round had 44 participants, with 28 participants participating in all three rounds. These 28 participants were gender-balanced and comprised participants from industry, academia, and health sectors from all continents. Consensus was reached on 16 characteristics, 9 aims, and 6 related fields. Discussion The consensus reached on attributes of PHI describe PHI as a multidisciplinary field that uses information technology and delivers tools with a focus on individual-centered care. It studies various effects of the use of such tools and technology. Its aims address the individuals in the role of patients, but also the health of a society as a whole. There are relationships to the fields of health informatics, digital health, medical informatics, and consumer health informatics. Conclusion We have proposed a preliminary definition, aims, and relationships of PHI based on literature and expert consensus. These can begin to be used to support development of research priorities and outcomes measurements.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Health Informatics

Reference28 articles.

1. Healthcare transformation towards personalized medicine - chances and challenges;B Blobel;Stud Health Technol Inform,2019

2. Perspectives from the patient and the healthcare professional in multiple sclerosis: social media and participatory medicine;D Kantor;Neurol Ther,2018

3. Patient participation–a review of the literature;J Cahill;J Clin Nurs,1998

4. What Is Participatory Health Research?

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Current Trends and New Approaches in Participatory Health Informatics;Methods of Information in Medicine;2023-12-29

2. How to Design Successful Participatory Design Workshops for Digital Health Solutions?;Caring is Sharing – Exploiting the Value in Data for Health and Innovation;2023-05-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3