Outcomes among Neonates after a Diagnosis of Persistent or Transient Fetal Growth Restriction Delivered at Term

Author:

Ramos Sebastian Z.1ORCID,Has Phinnara2,Gimovsky Alexis C.1ORCID,Danilack Valery A.3ORCID,Savitz David A.14,Lewkowitz Adam K.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women & Infants Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island

2. Lifespan Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design (BERD), Rhode Island Hospital, Lifespan Healthcare System, Providence, Rhode Island

3. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

4. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate whether transient fetal growth restriction (FGR) that resolves prior to delivery confers a similar risk of neonatal morbidity as uncomplicated FGR that persists at term. Study Design This is a secondary analysis of a medical record abstraction study of singleton live-born pregnancies delivered at a tertiary care center between 2002 and 2013. Patients with fetuses that had either persistent or transient FGR and delivered at 38 weeks or later were included. Patients with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies were excluded. Persistent FGR was defined as estimated fetal weight (EFW) <10th percentile by gestational age from diagnosis through delivery. Transient FGR was defined as EFW <10th percentile on at least one ultrasound, but not on the last ultrasound prior to delivery. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal morbidity: neonatal intensive care unit admission, Apgar's score <7 at 5 minutes, neonatal resuscitation, arterial cord pH <7.1, respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the newborn, hypoglycemia, sepsis, or death. Baseline characteristics and obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared using Wilcoxon's rank-sum and Fisher's exact test. Log binomial regression was used to adjust for confounders. Results Of 777 patients studied, 686 (88%) had persistent FGR and 91 (12%) had transient FGR. Patients with transient FGR were more likely to have a higher body mass index, gestational diabetes, diagnosed with FGR earlier in pregnancy, have spontaneous labor, and deliver at later gestational ages. There was no difference in the composite neonatal outcome (relative risk = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72, 1.47) for transient versus persistent FGR after adjusting for confounders (adjusted relative risk = 0.79, 95% CI 0.54, 1.17). There were no differences in cesarean delivery or delivery complications between groups. Conclusion Neonates born at term after transient FGR do not appear to have differences in composite morbidity compared with those where uncomplicated FGR persists at term. Key Points

Funder

National Institutes of Health

National Institutes of Health (NIH)/Office of Research on Women's Health Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health scholar funds to S.R.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference23 articles.

1. Prediction and prevention of recurrent stillbirth;U M Reddy;Obstet Gynecol,2007

2. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: fetal growth restriction;American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine;Obstet Gynecol,2019

3. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (Replaces Clinical Guideline Number 3, April 2012);J G Martins;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2020

4. Morbidity and mortality in small-for-gestational-age infants: a secondary analysis of nine MFMU network studies;H Mendez-Figueroa;Am J Perinatol,2017

5. Adult functional outcome of those born small for gestational age: twenty-six-year follow-up of the 1970 British Birth Cohort;R S Strauss;JAMA,2000

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3