Endoscopic trans-anal tube placement is a safe and helpful tool for colonic decompression: final results of a standardized single-centre retrospective assessment of 125 patients

Author:

Horn Andreas12,Sabet Manij3,Roghmann Florian4,Meves Volker5,Loss Martin3,Hochberger Juergen2,Benckert Christoph3,Berger Andreas Wolfgang26

Affiliation:

1. Praxis für Gastroenterologie, Berlin, Germany

2. Department of Gastroenterology, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany

3. Department of General Surgery, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany

4. Department of Urology, Ruhr University of Bochum Faculty of Medicine, Bochum, Germany

5. Department of Gastroenterology, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

6. Department of internal medicine, Ulm University Medical Faculty, Ulm, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Endoscopic trans-anal colonic decompression (ECD) may be requested in the case of massive colon distension, but evidence regarding success and safety issues remains scarce. The aim of this analysis is to examine the technical success, complications and clinical outcome in a large series of patients undergoing an ECD in various clinical scenarios. A standardized evaluation system was used to identify the pre-interventional risk parameters that might be helpful to guide clinical decision making. Methods In this single-centre retrospective study, the modified Clavien–Dindo classification (CDC) was applied to assess technical success, complications and clinical outcome of 125 consecutive patients who underwent ECD between 2007 and 2020. Primary endpoint: post interventional 90-day mortality. Secondary endpoints: periprocedural complications (CDC event IV-V) and technical success rate. All Martin criteria for standardized reporting of complications were met. Uni- and multivariable analyses for prediction of complications were carried out. Results The overall technical success rate was 90%. The periprocedural complication rate was low with 3%. Overall 90-day mortality was 31%. Univariable analyses showed a significant correlation between 90-day mortality and ASA≥4 (p<0.001, odds ratio [OR] 15.33), general anaesthesia (p=0.05, OR 21.42) and elevated serological infection parameters (p 0.028, OR 1.004). The pre-interventional multivariable model identified ASA ≥4 (p <0.001; OR 10.94) as the only independent risk factor. Conclusions ECD is a safe, easily available, technical feasible, inexpensive and successful tool for colonic decompression in various colonic obstruction scenarios, even in critically ill patients. ASA Score ≥IV can be helpful to identify patients at risk for complications/mortality after ECD.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3