Affiliation:
1. Division of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
2. Division of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
3. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Abstract
Abstract
Objective This study examined the chemical surface modification methods of resin composite repaired with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC).
Materials and Methods Ninety aged resin composite rods were produced and sorted into 9 groups of 10 specimens and surface modified with silane agent and/or bonding agent as follows: group 1, no surface modified; group 2, etch + single bond 2 (SB2); group 3, SB2; group 4, etch + RelyX ceramic primer (RXP) + SB2; group 5, RXP + SB2; group 6, etch + single bond universal (SU); group 7, SU; group 8, etch + RXP + SU; and group 9, RXP + SU. A clear silicone mold was placed on the top of specimen center, and then filled with RMGIC. The specimens' shear bond strengths (SBSs) were examined in mechanical testing equipment. To determine failure types, the fractured specimen surfaces were inspected using a stereomicroscope.
Statistical Analysis The data collected were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, and significance level was operated using Tukey's test (p < 0.05).
Results Group 8 had the greatest SBS, but it was statistically indistinguishable from groups 4, 5, and 9. The most frequent fracture mode was adhesive failure. High SBS was commonly associated with mixed failure.
Conclusion The use of bonding agents enhances the resin composite's wettability and allows it to bond to RMGIC. Moreover, the use of the silane coupling agent before applying bonding agent showed significantly higher bonding ability of resin composite and RMGIC interface.
Funder
Thammasat University Research Fund of Thammasat University, Thailand
Reference31 articles.
1. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations;I A Mjör;Oper Dent,2002
2. Repair or replacement of defective restorations by dentists in the Dental Practice-Based Research Network;V V Gordan;J Am Dent Assoc,2012
3. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations;V V Gordan;J Esthet Restor Dent,2006
4. Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial;G Moncada;J Am Dent Assoc,2009
5. Two-year clinical performance of dimethacrylate based composite restorations repaired with a silorane-based composite;D A Popoff;J Adhes Dent,2014
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献