Patients With Significant Medical Comorbidities May Benefit from Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Over Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

AbstractMany studies have compared outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA); however, to the authors' knowledge, there is no study evaluating complication rates in patients with significant comorbidities. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the incidence of postoperative complications, readmission and reoperation rates, length of stay (LOS), and discharge location for patients with significant medical comorbidities undergoing TKA versus UKA. Using the NSQIP database from 2008 to 2018, patients were identified by CPT code (27447 or 27446) and admission diagnostic code of primary osteoarthritis and included in the study if they had an American Society of Anesthesia score greater than or equal to 3. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. Multivariate regression was used to compare outcomes of interest between groups. A total of 167,054 patients were analyzed with 97.3% undergoing TKA. TKA patients had a greater overall complication rate than those undergoing UKA (p < 0.001). Readmission rates were approximately 1.5 times higher in TKA compared with UKA (p = 0.002), while no statistically significant difference was discovered in reoperation rates (p = 0.868). TKA was also associated with decreased rates of same day discharge, discharge within 24 hours of surgery, and discharge home (p < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). This study found an increase in complication rates, readmission rates, and LOS, along with a lower likelihood of discharge home when undergoing a TKA. These findings suggest that patients with significant medical comorbidities at baseline may benefit from UKA over TKA when anatomically indicated.