On-treatment Comparative Effectiveness of Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants in GARFIELD-VTE, and Focus on Cancer and Renal Disease

Author:

Haas Sylvia1,Farjat Alfredo E.2,Pieper Karen3,Ageno Walter4,Angchaisuksiri Pantep5,Bounameaux Henri6,Goldhaber Samuel Z.7,Goto Shinya8ORCID,Mantovani Lorenzo9,Prandoni Paolo10,Schellong Sebastian11,Turpie Alexander G.G.12,Weitz Jeffrey I.13,MacCallum Peter314,Cate Hugo ten15,Panchenko Elizaveta16,Carrier Marc17,Jerjes-Sanchez Carlos1819,Gibbs Harry20,Jansky Petr21,Kayani Gloria3,Kakkar Ajay K3,

Affiliation:

1. Formerly Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

2. Formerly Thrombosis Research Institute, London, United Kingdom

3. Thrombosis Research Institute, London, United Kingdom

4. Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy

5. Department of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand

6. Department of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland

7. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

8. Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Tokai University School of Medicine, Japan

9. Center for Public Health Research, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy

10. Arianna Foundation on Anticoagulation, Bologna, Italy

11. Department of Health Sciences, Medical Department 2, Municipal Hospital Dresden, Germany

12. McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

13. Department of Haematology, McMaster University and the Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

14. Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom

15. Department of Vascular Medicine and Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht; Maastricht, The Netherlands

16. National Medical Research Center of Cardiology of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation

17. Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada

18. Tecnológico de Monterrey. Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud., Monterrey, Mexico

19. Instituto de Cardiología y Medicina Vascular, TecSalud, Sa Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico

20. Vascular Laboratory, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

21. Motol University Hospital, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Prague, Czech Republic

Abstract

Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) provide a safe, effective alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment, as shown via intention-to-treat comparative effectiveness analysis. However, on-treatment analysis is imperative in observational studies because anticoagulation choice and duration are at investigators' discretion. Objectives The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of DOACs and VKAs on 12-month outcomes in VTE patients using on-treatment analysis. Methods The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD - VTE (GARFIELD-VTE) is a world-wide, prospective, non-interventional study observing treatment of VTE in routine clinical practice. Results In total, 8,034 patients received VKAs (n = 3,043, 37.9%) or DOACs (n = 4,991, 62.1%). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and follow-up bleeding events, and accounting for possible time-varying confounding, all-cause mortality was significantly lower with DOACs than VKAs (hazard ratio: 0.58 [95% confidence interval 0.42–0.79]). Furthermore, patients receiving VKAs were more likely to die of VTE complications (4.9 vs. 2.2%) or bleeding (4.9 vs. 0.0%). There was no significant difference in rates of recurrent VTE (hazard ratio: 0.74 [0.55–1.01]), major bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.76 [0.47–1.24]), or overall bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.87 [0.72–1.05]) with DOACs or VKAs. Unadjusted analyses suggested that VKA patients with active cancer or renal insufficiency were more likely to die than patients treated with DOAC (52.51 [37.33–73.86] vs. 26.52 [19.37–36.29] and 9.97 [7.51–13.23] vs. 4.70 [3.25–6.81] per 100 person-years, respectively). Conclusion DOACs and VKAs had similar rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding. However, DOACs were associated with reduced all-cause mortality and a lower likelihood of death from VTE or bleeding compared with VKAs.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3