Medical Abortion before Confirmed Intrauterine Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

Author:

Brandell Karin12,Reynolds-Wright John J.3,Boerma Clare4,Gibson Gillian5,Hognert Helena6,Tuladhar Heera7,Heikinheimo Oskari8,Cameron Sharon9,Gemzell-Danielsson Kristina110,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden

2. Södertalje Hospital, Södertalje, Sweden

3. MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

4. Family Planning NSW, Newington, Australia

5. Womens Health, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institution of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden

7. KIST Medical College Teaching Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal

8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

9. NHS Lothian and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

10. Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract“Very early medical abortion” (VEMA) refers to medical abortion (with mifepristone and misoprostol) before intrauterine pregnancy is visualized on ultrasound. Our aim is to present the current evidence on efficacy, safety (focused on ectopic pregnancies), and how to assess treatment success of VEMA. We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting outcomes of VEMA. The field is small and so our objective was to map all relevant literature, without conducting meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Medline, and Embase on April 19, 2022. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the evidence. A total of 373 articles were identified. Six articles (representing four observational and one pilot trial) were included in the final review. Across all included studies, treatment efficacy ranged between 91 and 100%. Prevalence of ectopic pregnancy was low and very few cases (n = 2) of ruptures were reported. Most studies used serial serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (s-hCG) levels to determine success of abortion; one study used low sensitivity urine hCG. From the available evidence, VEMA appears to be efficacious and does not appear to cause harm to ectopic pregnancies. Treatment can be assessed with pre- and postabortion s-hCG. Good quality, randomized controlled trial evidence is needed to best inform practice.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Physiology (medical),Obstetrics and Gynecology,Endocrinology,Reproductive Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Is contragestion the future?;BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health;2023-02-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3