25 × 5 Symposium to Reduce Documentation Burden: Report-out and Call for Action

Author:

Hobensack Mollie1,Levy Deborah R.2,Cato Kenrick13,Detmer Don E.4,Johnson Kevin B.5,Williamson Jeffrey6,Murphy Judy7,Moy Amanda8,Withall Jennifer1,Lee Rachel1,Rossetti Sarah Collins18,Rosenbloom Samuel Trent9

Affiliation:

1. Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, United States

2. Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States

3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States

4. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

5. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

6. American Medical Informatics Association, Bethesda, Maryland, United States

7. Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

8. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States

9. Departments of Biomedical Informatics Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Abstract

Abstract Background The widespread adoption of electronic health records and a simultaneous increase in regulatory demands have led to an acceleration of documentation requirements among clinicians. The corresponding burden from documentation requirements is a central contributor to clinician burnout and can lead to an increased risk of suboptimal patient care. Objective To address the problem of documentation burden, the 25 by 5: Symposium to Reduce Documentation Burden on United States Clinicians by 75% by 2025 (Symposium) was organized to provide a forum for experts to discuss the current state of documentation burden and to identify specific actions aimed at dramatically reducing documentation burden for clinicians. Methods The Symposium consisted of six weekly sessions with 33 presentations. The first four sessions included panel presentations discussing the challenges related to documentation burden. The final two sessions consisted of breakout groups aimed at engaging attendees in establishing interventions for reducing clinical documentation burden. Steering Committee members analyzed notes from each breakout group to develop a list of action items. Results The Steering Committee synthesized and prioritized 82 action items into Calls to Action among three stakeholder groups: Providers and Health Systems, Vendors, and Policy and Advocacy Groups. Action items were then categorized into as short-, medium-, or long-term goals. Themes that emerged from the breakout groups' notes include the following: accountability, evidence is critical, education and training, innovation of technology, and other miscellaneous goals (e.g., vendors will improve shared knowledge databases). Conclusion The Symposium successfully generated a list of interventions for short-, medium-, and long-term timeframes as a launching point to address documentation burden in explicit action-oriented ways. Addressing interventions to reduce undue documentation burden placed on clinicians will necessitate collaboration among all stakeholders.

Funder

NLM

AMIA

The National Institute of Nursing Research

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics

Reference29 articles.

1. Physician stress and burnout: the impact of health information technology;R L Gardner;J Am Med Inform Assoc,2019

2. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors;J S Ash;J Am Med Inform Assoc,2004

3. Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems, and health policy;M W Friedberg;Rand Health Q,2014

4. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons;T D Shanafelt;Ann Surg,2010

5. Association of resident fatigue and distress with perceived medical errors;C P West;JAMA,2009

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3