Evaluating YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Blefaroplasty

Author:

Savran Fatih1ORCID,Elibol Emine S.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

2. Department of Ophthalmologist, University of Health Sciences, Goztepe Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to evaluate the content and quality of popular videos about blepharoplasty treatment in YouTube. Four keywords “blepharoplasty,” “upper blepharoplasty,” “lower blepharoplasty,” and “blepharoplasty information” were searched in YouTube. After the videos were sorted by the number of views, the last 50 videos were based on general characteristics, primary purpose, information content, relevance, audiovisual quality, as well as viewer interaction index DISCERN score (minimum–maximum: 16–75), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score (minimum–maximum: 0–4), and Global Quality score (minimum–maximum: 0–5), and view rate formulas were calculated for each video. A total of the best 49 videos were evaluated in our study. The total number of views of these videos was 10,938,976. The total duration of these videos was 409minutes. The average duration of the videos was 8.35±8.38 (standard deviation [SD]). There was no significant (p>0.05) correlation between the measurement of DISCERN scores of the two observers. A significant (p<0.05) difference was observed between the JAMA score measurements of the two observers. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the GQS score measurements of the two observers. Currently, YouTube is not a viable resource for patients to learn about blepharoplasty. Physicians should be aware of the limitations and provide up-to-date and peer-reviewed content on the web site, and patients should also be warned about obtaining information.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Surgery

Reference27 articles.

1. Nonsurgical blepharoplasty;C Cantisani;Dermatol Ther (Heidelb),2019

2. Blepharoplasty complications;W P Mack;Facial Plast Surg,2012

3. Upper lid blepharoplasty;J D Weissman;Facial Plast Surg,2013

4. Investigation of automated perimetry in the evaluation of patients for upper lid blepharoplasty;H D Hacker;Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg,1992

5. Blepharoplasty;B S Biesman;Semin Cutan Med Surg,1999

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3