Clinician Acceptance of Order Sets for Pain Management: A Survey in Two Urban Hospitals

Author:

Liu Yifan1,Hao Haijing2,Sharma Mohit M.1,Harris Yonaka1,Scofi Jean3,Trepp Richard4,Farmer Brenna3,Ancker Jessica S.5,Zhang Yiye13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States

2. Department of Computer Information Systems, Bentley University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States

3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States

4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States

5. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States

Abstract

Abstract Background Order sets are a clinical decision support (CDS) tool in computerized provider order entry systems. Order set use has been associated with improved quality of care. Particularly related to opioids and pain management, order sets have been shown to standardize and reduce the prescription of opioids. However, clinician-level barriers often limit the uptake of this CDS modality. Objective To identify the barriers to order sets adoption, we surveyed clinicians on their training, knowledge, and perceptions related to order sets for pain management. Methods We distributed a cross-sectional survey between October 2020 and April 2021 to clinicians eligible to place orders at two campuses of a major academic medical center. Survey questions were adapted from the widely used framework of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. We hypothesize that performance expectancy (PE) and facilitating conditions (FC) are associated with order set use. Survey responses were analyzed using logistic regression. Results The intention to use order sets for pain management was associated with PE to existing order sets, social influence (SI) by leadership and peers, and FC for electronic health record (EHR) training and function integration. Intention to use did not significantly differ by gender or clinician role. Moderate differences were observed in the perception of the effort of, and FC for, order set use across gender and roles of clinicians, particularly emergency medicine and internal medicine departments. Conclusion This study attempts to identify barriers to the adoption of order sets for pain management and suggests future directions in designing and implementing CDS systems that can improve order sets adoption by clinicians. Study findings imply the importance of order set effectiveness, peer influence, and EHR integration in determining the acceptability of the order sets.

Funder

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics

Reference52 articles.

1. Clinical decision support: a 25 year retrospective and a 25 year vision;B Middleton;Yearb Med Inform,2016

2. A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support;J A Osheroff;J Am Med Inform Assoc,2007

3. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success;R T Sutton;NPJ Digit Med,2020

4. Development of a perioperative medication-related clinical decision support tool to prevent medication errors: an analysis of user feedback;K C Nanji;Appl Clin Inform,2021

5. Decision-centered design of patient information visualizations to support chronic pain care;C A Harle;Appl Clin Inform,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3