Developing the VA Geriatric Scholars Programs' Clinical Dashboards Using the PDSA Framework for Quality Improvement

Author:

Burningham Zachary12,Lagha Regina Richter3,Duford-Hutchinson Brittany2,Callaway-Lane Carol4,Sauer Brian C.12,Halwani Ahmad S.25,Bell Jamie12,Huynh Tina12,Douglas Joseph R.3,Kramer B. Josea36

Affiliation:

1. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

2. Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Centers of Innovation (COIN), Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

3. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States

4. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Health Care System, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, United States

5. Department of Hematology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

6. Division of Geriatric Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States

Abstract

Abstract Background Involving clinician end users in the development process of clinical dashboards is important to ensure that user needs are adequately met prior to releasing the dashboard for use. The challenge with following this approach is that clinician end users can undergo periodic turnover, meaning, the clinicians that played a role in the initial development process may not be the same individuals that use the dashboard in future. Objectives Here, we summarize our Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA)-guided clinical dashboard development process for the VA Geriatric Scholars Program (GSP) and the value of continuous, iterative development. We summarize dashboard adaptations that resulted from two PDSA cycles of improvement for the potentially inappropriate medication dashboard (PIMD), one of many Geriatric Scholars clinical dashboards. We also present the evaluative performance of the PIMD. Methods Evaluation of the PIMD was performed using the system usability scale (SUS) and through review of user interaction logs. Routine end users that were Geriatric Scholars and had evidence of 5 or more dashboard views were invited to complete an electronic form that contained the 10-item SUS. Results The proportion of Geriatric Scholars that utilized the PIMD increased for each iterative dashboard version that was produced as a byproduct from feedback (31.0% in 2017 to 60.2% in 2019). The overall usability of the PIMD among routine users was found to be above average (SUS score: 75.2 [95% CI 70.5–79.8]) in comparison to the recommended standard of acceptability (SUS score: 68) Conclusion The solicitation of feedback during dashboard orientations led to iterative adaptations of the PIMD that broadened its intended use. The presented PDSA-guided process to clinical dashboard development for the VA GSP can serve as a valuable framework for development teams seeking to produce well-adopted and usable health information technology (IT) innovations.

Funder

United States Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Rural Health

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics

Reference33 articles.

1. Electronic health records: then, now, and in the future;R S Evans;Yearb Med Inform,2016

2. Development of performance dashboards in healthcare sector: key practical issues;M Ghazisaeidi;Acta Inform Med,2015

3. Clinical dashboard development and use for academic detailing in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs;M K Lau;J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash DC),2019

4. Requirements for a quality dashboard: lessons from national clinical audits;R Randell;AMIA Annu Symp Proc,2020

5. The enhancing quality of prescribing practices for older veterans discharged from the emergency department (EQUIPPED) potentially inappropriate medication dashboard: a suitable alternative to the in-person academic detailing and standardized feedback reports of traditional EQUIPPED?;Z Burningham;Clin Ther,2020

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3