New Computerized Elbow and Forearm Clinical Scores

Author:

Herzberg Guillaume1ORCID,Burnier Marion2,Ly Lyliane3,Nakamura Toshiyatsu4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics, I-Trues Surgery Unit, Clinique Parc Lyon, Lyon, France

2. Department of Orthopedics, I-TRues Surgery Unit, Institut Main Membre Supérieur, Villeurbanne, France

3. Hospices Civils Lyon, Orthopedic Department, Lyon, France

4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Abstract Background Current elbow clinical scores are scarce with limited comparability between them. None of them are computerized yet. There is no forearm clinical score assessing all anatomical components of forearm disorders such as the Essex-Lopresti injuries. The aims of this paper were to present new computerized elbow and forearm clinical scores. Methods These new computerized elbow and forearm clinical scores include four clinical criteria: pain, function, active range of motion and muscle strength. To each criterion is given a numerical value among 5 grades. The weight of each criterion is equivalent so that patient's and physician's related scores are equally balanced. Results Clinical scores components are automatically included into diamond-shape graphs and tables that can be directly exported into PowerPoint presentations for demonstration and comparison purposes. Discussion These user-friendly updatable clinical elbow and forearm scores are based on four classic clinical criteria, pain, function, motion, and strength that are expressed into grades. They were designed to evaluate any osteoarticular elbow or forearm disorder regardless of the etiology. These scores are open since they may be modified in future versions.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Reference14 articles.

1. Electronic patient-reported outcome collection systems in orthopaedic clinical practice;V A Lizzio;JBJS Rev,2019

2. Outcomes of distal humerus fractures: What are we measuring?;A Zarezadeh;Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2018

3. Update on the state of outcome measurement in TEA research. identifying a need for consensus;K Riedel;J Bone Joint Surg Am,2013

4. A new wrist clinical evaluation score;G Herzberg;J Wrist Surg,2018

5. Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability;D C Turchin;J Bone Joint Surg Am,1998

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3