Provider Response to a Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment and Prophylaxis Ordering Tool: Observational Study

Author:

Khan Sundas12,King D'Arcy3,Osmani Soheb4,Harte Owen5,Solomon Jeffrey4,Niranjan Kunti4,Rosenberg David J.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States

2. Department of Medicine, Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veteran Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Houston, Texas, United States

3. Department of Clinical Psychology, Fielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, California, United States

4. Department of Medicine, Institute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, United States

5. Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States

6. Department of Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, United States

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Our health system launched an initiative to regulate venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment and prophylaxis with electronically embedded risk assessment models based on validated clinical prediction rules. Prior to system-wide implementation, usability testing was conducted on the VTE clinical decision support system (CDSS) to assess provider perceptions, facilitate adoption, and usage of the tool. The objective of this study was to conduct usability testing with end users on the CDSS' risk assessment model and prophylaxis ordering components. Methods This laboratory usability testing study was conducted with 24 health care providers. Participants were given two case scenarios that mirrored real-world scenarios to assess likelihood of use and adoption. During each case scenario, participants engaged in a think-aloud session, verbalizing their decision-making process while interacting with the tool. Following each case scenario, participants completed the System Usability Scale (SUS) and a posttask interview. Participants' comments and interactions with the VTE CDSS were placed into coding categories and analyzed for generalizable themes by three independent coders. Results Of the 24 participants, 50% were female and the mean age of all participants was 32.76 years. The average SUS across the different services lines was 72.39 (C grade). Each participant's comments were grouped into three overarching themes: functionality, visibility/navigation, and content. Comments included personalizing workflow for each service line, minimizing the number of clicks, clearly defining risk models, including background on risk scores, and providing treatment guidelines for order sets. Conclusion An important step toward providing quality health care to patients at risk of developing a VTE event is providing user-friendly tools to providers. Following usability testing, our study revealed opportunities to positively impact provider behavior and acceptance. The rigor and breadth of this usability testing study and adoption of the optimizations should increase provider adoption and retention of the VTE CDSS.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics

Reference33 articles.

1. Estimated annual numbers of US acute-care hospital patients at risk for venous thromboembolism;F A Anderson Jr.;Am J Hematol,2007

2. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality;A T Cohen;Thromb Haemost,2007

3. Venous thromboembolism: a call for risk assessment in all hospitalised patients;G E Raskob;Thromb Haemost,2016

4. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis;P S Wells;N Engl J Med,2003

5. The use of weighted and scored risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism;A C Spyropoulos;Thromb Haemost,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3