Anticoagulation-Associated Bleeding in Patients Screened for Atrial Fibrillation versus Usual Care—A Post Hoc Analysis from the LOOP Study

Author:

Kongebro Emilie Katrine1ORCID,Diederichsen Søren Zöga1,Xing Lucas Yixi1,Haugan Ketil Jørgen2,Graff Claus3,Højberg Søren4,Olesen Morten S.15,Krieger Derk67,Brandes Axel8910,Køber Lars111,Svendsen Jesper Hastrup111

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital—Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

2. Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Roskilde, Denmark

3. Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

4. Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

5. Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

6. Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

7. Department of Neurology, Mediclinic Parkview Hospital, Al Barsha South, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

8. Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

9. Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark

10. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark—Esbjerg, Esbjerg, Denmark

11. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence is rising; however, data on the bleeding risks associated with the detection of subclinical AF are needed. Objective Our objective was to determine the bleeding increment associated with implantable loop recorder (ILR) screening for subclinical AF and subsequent anticoagulation initiation compared with usual care. Methods This post hoc study utilized LOOP trial data from 6,004 elderly patients with stroke risks randomized to either ILR (n = 1,503) or usual care (n = 4,503). The mean follow-up time was 64.5 months, and none were lost to follow-up. The primary exposure was the initiation of oral anticoagulation, and the main outcome was the risk of major bleeding events following initiation of oral anticoagulants (OACs), determined by time-dependent cox regression. Second, we investigated antithrombotic prescription patterns and major bleeding events after antiplatelet treatment and in subgroups. Results OAC was initiated in 1,019 participants with a mean age (years) of 78.8 (± 4.67) in control versus 77.0 (± 4.84) in ILR, p < 0.0001. Altogether did 202 participants end or pause OAC treatment. Among AF patients (n = 910) had 40 (28%) completely ended OAC and 105 (72%) temporarily paused OAC during follow-up. Major bleeding events totaled 221 (3.7%). Forty-seven major bleeding events followed an OAC initiation in 1,019 participants (4.6%); 26 versus 21 events in the control and ILR groups, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) for major bleeding after OAC initiation compared with before initiation was 2.08 (1.50–2.90) p < 0.0001 overall, 2.81 (1.82–4.34) p < 0.0001 for control and 1.32 (0.78–2.23) p = 0.31 for the ILR group (p = 0.07 for interaction). Antiplatelet treatment resulted in an overall adjusted HR of 1.3 (0.96–1.75) p = 0.09. For OAC users aged ≥75 years in the ILR group, the rate of major bleeding was 1.73 (0.92–2.96) compared with 0.84 (0.36–1.66) for an age <75 years, and the rate of the corresponding control subgroup aged ≥75 years was 2.20 (1.23–3.63) compared with 1.64 (0.82–2.93) for an age <75 years. Conclusion The individual risk of major bleeding increased twofold after initiation of oral anticoagulation for all patients in this study. However, the patients screened for subclinical AF did not have a higher bleeding risk after initiation of anticoagulation compared with those in usual care. Trial Registration: The LOOP study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT020364 50

Funder

AFFECT EU consortium/European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme

Aalborg University Talent Management Programme

Hjerteforeningen

Medtronic Foundation

Innovationsfonden

Skibsreder Per Henriksen, R. og hustrus fond

The Reasearch Foundation for the Capital Region of Denmark

Arvid Nilssons Fond

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Hematology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3