Do nursing textbooks accurately describe pulse oximetry? An audit of current literature

Author:

Elliott Malcolm1,Williamson Roz2

Affiliation:

1. Senior Lecturer, Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

2. Lecturer, Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Background: The assessment of a patient's vital signs is a critical nursing task. Despite this, research has found that many nurses have a poor understanding of pulse oximetry. Aim: As undergraduate students rely heavily on textbooks as an educational resource, an audit was conducted of nursing texts to determine the quality of pulse oximetry descriptions. Method: The audit was guided by questions based on the findings of research examining nurses' understanding of pulse oximetry. Two researchers used these questions to appraise textbook content. Findings: A convenience sample of 32 contemporary nursing textbooks was appraised. Text descriptions of pulse oximetry varied from brief to more extensive, with the content ranging from superficial to detailed. Conclusion: Superficial, inconsistent or misleading information within basic nursing textbooks may be one factor associated with nurses' knowledge deficits about pulse oximetry. Academics and nurse educators should appraise core content of textbooks carefully before recommending textbooks to nursing students.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

General Nursing

Reference63 articles.

1. Al-Shaikh B, Stacey S. Essentials of anaesthetic equipment. 5th edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2019

2. Aston D, Rivers A, Dharmadasa A. Equipment in anaesthesia and critical care: a complete guide for the FRCA. Banbury: Scion; 2014

3. Baillie L. Developing practical nursing skills. 4th edn. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2014

4. Berman A, Snyder S, Levett-Jones T, Burton T, Harvey N. Skills in clinical nursing. Melbourne: Pearson; 2017

5. Berman A, Snyder S, Levett-Jones T et al. Kozier and Erb's fundamentals of nursing: concepts, process and practice. 4th Australian edn. Melbourne: Pearson; 2018

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3