An exploration of why qualified mental health nurse prescribers do not prescribe

Author:

Oldknow Helen1,Gillibrand Warren2,Clifton Andrew3

Affiliation:

1. Research Nurse: Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust

2. Senior Lecturer, Huddersfield University

3. Associate Professor, De Montfort University

Abstract

This article is an exploratory study of perceptions in mental health nurses who are qualified to prescribe yet choose not to do so. In-depth semi-structured face-to-face interviews, field notes and analysis of documents were used to investigate the perceptions of the non–prescribing nurse prescriber. A mapping exercise was conducted to identify potential participants. Interview data analysis was based on the principles of descriptive phenomenology and the research was theoretically framed within concepts of power, structure/agency and culture. This study has contributed to understanding the views of non-prescribing mental health nurse prescribers on why they do not use their prescribing qualification. The findings from this study suggest that there are complex, interlocking factors: power and knowledge; culture; and structure and agency, which may enable or prevent mental health nurse prescribers from independently prescribing.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology (nursing)

Reference15 articles.

1. Nurse prescribing by children’s nurses: views of doctors and clinical leads in one specialist children’s hospital

2. Professional identity in community mental health nursing: A thematic analysis

3. Department of Health. Improving mental health services by extending the role of nurses in prescribing and supplying medication: good practice guide. London: National Prescribing Centre, National Institute for Mental Health in England and the Department of Health; 2005.

4. An evaluation of team and individual formularies to support independent prescribing in mental health care

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3