The importance of learning and knowledge sharing to support implementation of total quality management in healthcare

Author:

Lebcir Reda M1,Sideras James D1

Affiliation:

1. Hertfordshire Business School, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK

Abstract

Background/Aims Implementation of total quality management in healthcare services has often been unsuccessful. This is a result of a variety of factors, including the inadequacy of learning and knowledge sharing methods to support implementation. This study aimed to explore how learning and knowledge sharing policies influence total quality management initiatives in the healthcare sector. Methods An extended total quality management model, named the ethical, adaptive, learning, and improvement model, was developed and implemented in a private healthcare organisation in the UK. Using action research, data were collected from 91 participants over a 21-month period from qualitative interviews, focus groups and participant observations. Results Practice-based training was found to increase employee competence, reflecting the importance of tacit knowledge sharing. The model led to the prevalent blame culture changing to a learning culture through an appreciative management style that focused on recognising what is done right. In addition, patients' satisfaction and quality of care improved through community groups that were set up to address quality problems and patients' needs. Conclusions Adequate knowledge sharing methods play an important role in improving quality in healthcare. Greater consideration should be given to this widely ignored aspect when implementing total quality management in NHS trusts.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference28 articles.

1.

Total quality management in the health-care context: integrating the literature and directing future research

2. Why Total Quality Management Programs Do Not Persist: The Role of Management Quality and Implications for Leading a TQM Transformation*

3. Bryman A, Bell E. Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011

4. Coghlan D, Brannick T. Doing action research in your own organization. London: Sage Publications; 2010

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3