Understanding antenatal care use in pastoralist communities: a focused ethnographic study in Kenya

Author:

Barako Talaso D1,Spiby Helen2,Evans Catrin2,Konstantinidis Stathis2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Community Health and Reproductive Health Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

2. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Health Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Abstract

Background/Aims The provision of high-quality antenatal care improves maternal and child health outcomes. Pastoralist communities face unique challenges in accessing healthcare associated with a nomadic, marginalised lifestyle, and have high rates of maternal morbidity and mortality. There is minimal evidence on antenatal care use globally among this group. To develop optimal services for pastoralist communities, there is an urgent need to understand pastoralist women's use of antenatal care services. This study's aim was to explore experiences of antenatal care among pastoralist communities in Kenya, to identify key barriers and facilitators of uptake. Methods This focused ethnographic qualitative study was underpinned by a philosophy of critical realism. A total of 58 participants (women, husbands, traditional birth attendants and nurses) were included. Data were collected using interviews, focus group discussions and observation. Data were collected for 6 months in six villages and five health facilities in a pastoralist region of northern Kenya. Inductive thematic analysis and retroduction were used to identify concepts, structures and mechanisms that influenced antenatal care use. Results Pastoralist women's antenatal care experiences and use were linked to two main themes. The first was government policies that incentivised antenatal care use by linking the provision of the baby's health and citizenship records to antenatal care uptake and encouraging traditional birth attendants to adopt defined referral roles. The second highlighted multiple structural barriers that impeded consistent antenatal care uptake, including the pastoralist lifestyle, cultural barriers, health system constraints and a gap in information sharing. The dissonance between these led to partial, sub-optimal use patterns of antenatal care. Conclusions Government policy created an impetus for the pastoralist community to use contemporary healthcare services. At the same time, multiple barriers impeded access to services. This explains the partial use of antenatal care services among pastoralist communities. The findings throw doubt on the feasibility of antenatal care guidelines that recommend eight contacts during pregnancy. There is a need to work collaboratively with communities to develop context-specific models of care.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

Building and Construction

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3