The health belief model and self-determination theory in explaining the use of antenatal care services: a cross-sectional study

Author:

Tungaraza Maximillian B1,Joho Angelina A1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Nursing, University of Dodoma, Dodoma City, Tanzania

Abstract

Introduction Antenatal care services are vitally important in monitoring pregnancy and identifying the risk factors during pregnancy. However, many pregnant women under-use these services and factors associated with under-use are not well explained. Therefore, this study aimed to use the health belief model and self-determination theory to explore antenatal care services use among postnatal women in the Mara region. Methods A hospital-based cross-sectional study involving postnatal women from April to July 2020 was conducted using a structured questionnaire. A total of 384 postnatal women were recruited using systematic sampling. The associations between constructs of the health belief model and self-determination theories with antenatal care service variables were examined using the Chi-squared test, followed by logistic regression analysis. P<0.05 at 95% confidence interval was considered statically significant. Results Of 384 participants, 53.4% were self-determined on antenatal care services use, 46.9% had a high level of perception on antenatal care services use and 49.7% had adequate knowledge on antenatal care services use. Being from the Kurya tribe reduced the odds of being self-determined. Most (85.9%) postnatal women had attended fewer than eight recommended antenatal care visits. Multivariate analysis showed low autonomy (P=0.038), and low perceived barriers (P=0.007) were predictors for antenatal care visits. Conclusions Antenatal care services are still inadequately used in the Mara region. Low perceived autonomy and low perceived barriers are significantly associated with antenatal care services use. Health management teams and health stakeholders should collaborate to improve the situation.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

Building and Construction

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3