An exploration of midwives' views of the latest World Health Organization labour care guide

Author:

Laisser Rose1,Danna Valentina Actis2,Bonet Mercedes3,Oladapo Olufemi T.3,Lavender Tina2

Affiliation:

1. The Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza, Tanzania, UK

2. Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK

3. UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

Background/aims Effective labour monitoring is integral to intrapartum care. Yet, to date, tools to facilitate this have not reached their potential. This study aims to explore midwives' initial reactions to the latest World Health Organization labour care guide, which is a replacement to the existing partograph, to enable adaptations to be made and to inform implementation strategies. Methods This was a qualitative study that used interviews and focus groups to gather data from a convenience sample of midwife delegates from six sub-Saharan Africa countries who were attending a midwifery conference in Malawi. Data were analysed thematically. Results A total of 43 participants participated; six focus groups and 12 individual interviews were conducted. Participants expressed both positive and negative views of the guide. Three main themes were found. The theme ‘sticking to what is familiar’ demonstrated reluctance to change; ‘chart based on usual or optimum practice’ suggested that midwives wanted a chart that reflects the routine care provided as opposed to the evidence-based care they should provide; and ‘measures for effective implementation’ highlighted the importance of having carefully considered and robust strategies for implementing the guide. Conclusions This rapid evaluation provided a snapshot of midwives' initial reactions to the new labour care guide. Although the existing partograph has not reached its full potential, midwives showed a reluctance to change it for something new. Feedback from participants has been fed into the development phase of the guide, informing its presentation, contents and field testing.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3