Factors that characterise clinical decision making among midwifery students in Malawi

Author:

Sakala Betty1,Chorwe-Sungani Genesis1,Kafulafula Ursula1,Kumbani Lily1

Affiliation:

1. Kamuzu College of Nursing, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi

Abstract

Background/Aims Professional knowledge and competencies related to decision making and lessons learnt during midwifery education influence midwives' clinical decision making. The midwifery curriculum for student midwives includes the decision-making process during nursing training and midwives are expected to apply this knowledge and skill during midwifery practice. Factors that positively or negatively affect clinical decision making among midwives in Malawi are not well understood. This study aimed to identify factors that characterise clinical decision making among midwifery students in Malawi. Methods This was a cross-sectional descriptive study that used quantitative methods underpinned by a positivist paradigm. Proportional stratified sampling was used to select 124 fourth year student midwives from two public universities. A questionnaire was used to gather data from respondents on how strongly they agreed or disagreed that certain factors affect clinical decision making. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and Pearson's chi-squared was calculated to determine differences in respondents' mean scores. Significance was set at P=0.05. Results Factors found to positively affect clinical decision making were skills and knowledge, collaboration with other health workers, confidence, supportive supervision, positive feedback, a conducive working environment, mentoring by senior midwives, availability of clear guidelines and frameworks, clinical reasoning and intuition. Respondents' mean scores on factors that positively or negatively affect clinical decision making varied significantly (P<0.001) in relation to age, institution and department. Conclusions Although students are taught about decision making during their training, there are factors that hinder their capability to implement the skill. Therefore, it is necessary for training institutions to find ways to evaluate students' clinical decision making both before and after they join the workforce to identify and bridge any gaps in knowledge.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3