What went wrong with the Liverpool Care Pathway and how can we avoid making the same mistakes again?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

What went wrong with the Liverpool Care Pathway and how can we avoid making the same mistakes again?

Published:2013-08 Issue:8 Volume:19 Page:372-373
ISSN:1357-6321
Container-title:International Journal of Palliative Nursing
language:en
Short-container-title:International Journal of Palliative Nursing

Author:

Hughes Sean,Preston Nancy¹,Payne Sheila²

Affiliation:

1. Palliative Care

2. International Observatory on End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Furness College, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YG, England

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Link

http://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/pdf/10.12968/ijpn.2013.19.8.372

Reference10 articles.

1. Care of the dying: what a difference an LCP makes!

2. How is agitation and restlessness managed in the last 24 h of life in patients whose care is supported by the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient?

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Is the content of guidelines/pathways a barrier for the integration of palliative Care in Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) and chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD)? A comparison with the case of cancer in Europe;BMC Palliative Care;2017-11-28

2. The Liverpool Care Pathway: discarded in cancer patients but good enough for dying nursing home patients? A systematic review;BMC Medical Ethics;2017-08-09

3. Integrated palliative care in Europe: a qualitative systematic literature review of empirically-tested models in cancer and chronic disease;BMC Palliative Care;2016-07-08