Barriers and facilitators to out-of-hospital pain management for children

Author:

Downs Simon1,Carey Nicola2,Mold Freda3

Affiliation:

1. Paramedic Field Lead, University of Surrey

2. Head of Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the Highlands and Islands

3. Senior Lecturer in Integrated Care, University of Surrey; UK

Abstract

Pain is one of the most common symptoms presented by patients of all ages to ambulance services. While children in pain make up a relatively small proportion of the patients attended by prehospital care services, medical intervention is needed in only 40% of cases. This might go some way to explaining why management of paediatric pain is perceived as poor. Aim: To establish and explore published barriers and facilitators to out-of-hospital pain management for children aged <18 years. Methods: Key search terms were used to search the three databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE and PSYCHInfo) individually and simultaneously. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and 15 papers were identified as meeting the criteria and were subject to data extraction. Results: Three broad themes were identified; organisational factors, patient factors and clinician factors. Conclusion: From considering international systems and aspects of care, it can generally be accepted that the assessment and management of paediatric pain is below what would be expected, and compared with with that for adults, it is sub-optimal. Multiple demographic influences are evident and appear to influence clinician decisions.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

General Engineering

Reference29 articles.

1. Aveyard H. Doing a literature review in health and social care a practical guide. 3rd edn. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press; 2014

2. Pain Assessment in Children Younger Than 8 Years in Out-of-Hospital Emergency Medicine

3. Effectiveness of Prehospital Morphine, Fentanyl, and Methoxyflurane in Pediatric Patients

4. Booth A, Sutton A, Papaioannou D. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: Sage; 2016

5. Brown SN, Kumar D, Millins M, Mark J (eds). JRCALC clinical practice supplementary guidelines 2017. Bridgwater: Class Professional; 2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3