‘Do not attempt CPR’ in the community: the experience of ambulance clinicians

Author:

Moffat Suzanne1,Fritz Zoë2,Slowther Anne-Marie3,Parry Matthew4,Barclay Stephen5

Affiliation:

1. Resuscitation Officer, Hinchingbrooke Hospital, and Lecturer in Paramedic Sciences, University of East Anglia

2. Consultant Physician in Acute Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals, and Wellcome Trust Fellow, Warwick University

3. Reader in Clinical Ethics, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School

4. Senior Lecturer in Statistics, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

5. University Senior Lecturer in General Practice and Palliative Care, Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK

Abstract

Background: Ambulance clinicians must make time-critical decisions concerning treatment and resuscitation. Little is known about the impact of the presence (or absence) of do-not-attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) decision forms in the community. Aims: To investigate ambulance clinicians' experiences of DNACPR documentation and views concerning potential future changes. Methods: This multi-methods study used semi-structured face-to-face interviews (n=10) and an online questionnaire (n=123) Findings: Ambulance clinicians report that a statistically significant increase in numbers of community DNACPR forms has occurred in recent years. Most state they have not had formal DNACPR education and experience difficulties in making clinical judgments about patients at the end of life, reporting inappropriate CPR attempts and poor communication among stakeholders. Conclusion: Assessment of patients near the end of life with (and especially without) a DNACPR is challenging for ambulance clinicians. Education about resuscitation recommendations needs to be integrated into training and a national approach should be taken to decisions and their documentation.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3