A post-structuralist feminist analysis of electronic fetal monitoring in labour

Author:

Melamed Anna1

Affiliation:

1. Midwifery lecturer, University of the West of England

Abstract

Constant electronic fetal monitoring has become a ubiquitous part of birth management in most high-income countries, both reflecting and creating the social context. This article uses a post-structuralist feminist critique to show that the use of the cardiotocograph in birth reinforces and reflects the logic of the separate sovereign self. This creates a rupture in the intrinsic relationality of the mother–fetus and the mother–midwife on a philosophical and physiological level. The cardiotocograph in labour privileges the medical model, constrains women through wires and the imperative to ‘keep the trace’, takes everyone’s attention and gives midwives tasks other than caring for the woman. It externalises the fetus and gives it selfhood separate from the mother, to the extent that it can seem like the machine is keeping the baby alive. This undermines women’s and midwives’ subjective knowledge, relegating women to organic containers. A reimagining of birth that centres relationality would start by acknowledging the nature of the self as semi-permeable and the being/doing, both/and nature of the mother–placenta–fetus in pregnancy and birth. Intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart in labour is better able to centre the mother–placenta–fetus relation and the midwife–mother relation.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

Maternity and Midwifery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Using a novel approach to explore women's caesarean birth experience;British Journal of Midwifery;2024-05-02

2. The intersection between logical empiricism and qualitative nursing research: a post-structuralist analysis;International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being;2024-02-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3