Use of autologous conditioned serum dressings in hard-to-heal wounds: a randomised prospective clinical trial

Author:

Gholian Shakiba1,Pishgahi Alireza2,Shakouri Seyed Kazem2,Eslamian Fariba2,Yousefi Mehdi3,Kheiraddin Behzad Pourabbas4,Dareshiri Shahla2,Yarani Reza56,Dolatkhah Neda2

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

2. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Aging Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

3. Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

4. Department of Polymer Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran

5. Interventional Regenerative Medicine and Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, US

6. Translational Type 1 Diabetes Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to assess both the efficacy and tolerability of autologous conditioned serum (ACS) as an innovative wound dressing in the local management of hard-to-heal wounds. Method: In this single-blinded randomised controlled trial, patients with hard-to-heal wounds were randomly assigned to receive either ACS treatment or normal saline (NS) dressings. The treatment was applied once a week for three weeks with a final assessment at three weeks from the first ACS application. Results: A total of 30 patients took part in the study. Analysis of wound assessment data demonstrated statistically significant differences for wound surface area and Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing scores (area score, exudate and tissue) from baseline to the end of the study in patients who received the ACS dressing, but not in patients who received the normal saline dressing. There were statistically significant differences in changes in: the wound surface area at week three (–6.4±2.69cm2 versus +0.4±2.52cm2); area score at week three (–2.2±1.08 versus +0.2±0.86); exudate at week two (–1.2±0.70 versus +0.0±0.45) and at week 3 (–1.3±0.72 versus –0.1±0.63); tissue at week two (–1.1±0.35 versus +0.0±0.53) and at week three (–1.8±0.65 versus –0.1±0.63); and the PUSH total score at week one (–1.6±0.98 versus +0.4±1.22), week two (–3.2±0.86 versus +0.4±0.98) and week three (–5.3±1.17 versus –0.0±1.33) between the ACS and NS groups, respectively. Conclusion: This trial revealed a significant decrease in wound surface area as well as a considerable improvement in wound healing in the ACS dressing group.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

Nursing (miscellaneous),Fundamentals and skills

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3