Evaluation of a new low-cost negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of a new and low-cost negative pressure wound therapy (LC-NPWT) in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Method: In this retrospective cohort study, patients from our inpatient clinic with Wagner grade 3 DFUs were given LC-NPWT or conventional wound dressings. The primary outcome was the wound healing rates. Complete wound healing, defined as complete re-epithelialisation of the wound, was recorded during the two months of follow-up. The definition of complete epidermis of the wound was that the skin was closed (100% re-epithelialisation), with no drainage or dressing. The secondary outcomes were the number of inpatient days and surgical procedures, and outcomes after hospital discharge. The wound score from the Bates–Jensen wound assessment tool and the levels of the inflammation factors procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were compared between the two groups. The Kaplan–Meier survival estimate was used to examine the cumulative wound healing rate. Results: The study cohort comprised 41 patients. The two-month wound healing rate was higher in patients in the LC-NPWT group than in the control group (15/21 (71.4%) versus 8/20 (40.0%), respectively; p=0.043). At the end of the two-month follow-up period, the cumulative wound healing rate was higher in the LC-NPWT group than in the control group (p=0.032). Patients in the LC-NPWT group had fewer inpatient days (19.3±3.84 versus 25.05±4.81; p<0.001) and shorter duration of antibiotic use (32.14±3.89 days versus 36.10±5.80 days; p=0.014) than those who received conventional wound dressings. There were significant improvements in mean wound score between the LC-NPWT group and the control group (p<0.001). After one week of treatment, the blood levels of PCT (0.03±0.30ng/ml versus 0.07±0.08ng/ml; p=0.039), CRP (14.55±13.40mg/l versus 24.71±18.10mg/l; p=0.047) and ESR (42.05±29.29mm/h versus 61.65±22.42mm/h; p=0.021) were lower in patients who received LC-NPWT than those who received conventional wound dressings. Conclusion: LC-NPWT is effective in the treatment of DFUs and provides a cheaper alternative for patients with DFUs that could potentially alleviate the economic distress these patients endure.