Clinical prediction models and risk tools for early detection of patients at risk of surgical site infection and surgical wound dehiscence: a scoping review

Author:

Sandy-Hodgetts Kylie12,Assadian Ojan34,Wainwright Thomas W56,Rochon Melissa7,Van Der Merwe Zhavandre8,Jones Rhidian Morgan9,Serena Thomas10,Alves Paulo11,Smith George12

Affiliation:

1. Program Lead, Skin Integrity Research Group, Centre for Molecular Medicine & Innovative Therapeutics, Health Futures Institute Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia

2. Adjunct Senior Research Fellow, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia

3. Medical Director, Regional Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Austria

4. Institute for Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, UK

5. Professor of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Institute, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK

6. Physiotherapy Department, University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK

7. Trust Lead for SSI Surveillance, Research & Innovation Surveillance and Innovation Unit, Directorate of Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, UK

8. Director 4 Wounds Wound Care Practice, Pretoria, South Africa

9. Schoen Clinic Orthopaedic and Spinal Hospital, London, UK

10. The SerenaGroup, Cambridge, MA, US

11. Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Wounds Research Lab, Portugal

12. Vascular Surgery Unit, Hull York Medical School, York, UK

Abstract

Objective: Despite advances in surgical techniques, intraoperative practice and a plethora of advanced wound therapies, surgical wound complications (SWCs), such as surgical site infection (SSI) and surgical wound dehiscence (SWD), continue to pose a considerable burden to the patient and healthcare setting. Predicting those patients at risk of a SWC may give patients and healthcare providers the opportunity to implement a tailored prevention plan or potentially ameliorate known risk factors to improve patient postoperative outcomes. Method: A scoping review of the literature for studies which reported predictive power and internal/external validity of risk tools for clinical use in predicting patients at risk of SWCs after surgery was conducted. An electronic search of three databases and two registries was carried out with date restrictions. The search terms included ‘prediction surgical site infection’ and ‘prediction surgical wound dehiscence’. Results: A total of 73 records were identified from the database search, of which six studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, the majority of validated risk tools were predominantly within the cardiothoracic domain, and targeted morbidity and mortality outcomes. There were four risk tools specifically targeting SWCs following surgery. Conclusion: The findings of this review have highlighted an absence of well-developed risk tools specifically for SSI and/or SWD in most surgical populations. This review suggests that further research is required for the development and clinical implementation of rigorously validated and fit-for-purpose risk tools for predicting patients at risk of SWCs following surgery. The ability to predict such patients enables the implementation of preventive strategies, such as the use of prophylactic antibiotics, delayed timing of surgery, or advanced wound therapies following a procedure.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

Nursing (miscellaneous),Fundamentals and skills

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3