Limitations of popular methods used for calibrating sensors for the measurement of sub-bandage pressure

Author:

Thomas Stephen1

Affiliation:

1. Retired Director of the Surgical Materials Testing Laboratory, Wales, Medetec, Cardiff, UK.

Abstract

Sensors commonly used to record sub-bandage pressures may be less reliable than is commonly believed. The techniques employed for the calibration or validation of these devices can sometimes produce a highly inaccurate prediction of their performance in vivo. In this review, the various calibration methods referenced in the literature are briefly described and the limitations of each discussed. The significance of these limitations is illustrated by reference to the results of published studies cited in a systematic review which report widely different values for the accuracy of one particular device, the Kikuhime pressure measuring system (ZiboCare, Denmark). The use of inappropriate calibration techniques therefore casts serious doubt upon the pressure values quoted historically in many published scientific and clinical studies in which these particular instruments have been employed. It is proposed that an international standard method be developed to ensure that all sensors intended for the measurement of sub-bandage pressure are characterised using a validated, clinically relevant technique. A programme of education is also required to correct some of the widely held misconceptions often expressed in the literature concerning the use of the Laplace equation to calculate sub-bandage pressure.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3