Efficacy and safety of autologous whole blood clot in diabetic foot ulcers: a randomised controlled trial

Author:

Snyder Robert1,Nouvong Aksone2,Ulloa Jesus3,Wahab Naz4,Treadwell Terry5,Bruwer Febe6,Naude Liezl7,McGuire James8,Reyzelman Alexander M9,Graham Timothy10,Lessing Rene11,Lullove Eric12,Ozker Emre13,Pham Hau T14,Pasternac Michael15,Cohen Shira16

Affiliation:

1. Barry University Clinical Research, North Miami Beach, FL, US

2. Olive View UCLA Education & Research Institute, Sylmar, CA, US

3. VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, US

4. Wahab Consulting and Research LLC, Las Vegas, NV, US

5. Institute for Advanced Wound Care at Baptist Medical Center South, Montgomery, AL, US

6. Wound Care South Africa, Germiston, South Africa

7. Eloquent Health & Wellness, Tyger Valley, South Africa

8. Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, US

9. California College of Pediatric Medicine, Center for Clinical Research Inc., San Francisco, CA, US

10. Memorial Health System, Belpre, OH, US

11. Haute Care, Lyttelton, South Africa, US

12. Coconut Creek, FL, US

13. Acinadem Altunizade, Istanbul, Turkey

14. Foot Care Specialists of Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, US

15. Future Health Research Clinic, Miami, FL, US

16. RedDress Medical, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, US

Abstract

Objective: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) present a significant global health challenge, resulting in high morbidity and economic costs. Current available treatments often fail to achieve satisfactory healing rates, highlighting the need for novel therapies. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel autologous whole blood clot (AWBC)—a blood-based, biodegradable provisional matrix—in conjunction with standard of care (SoC) when compared to SoC alone in the treatment of hard-to-heal DFUs. Method: A multicentre, prospective, blinded assessor, randomised controlled trial was conducted at 16 sites across the US, South Africa and Turkey. A cohort of patients with hard-to-heal DFUs was enrolled and randomised to either the AWBC group or the control group. The primary endpoint was complete wound closure at 12 weeks, while secondary endpoints included time to heal and percentage area reduction (PAR) at four and eight weeks. Data were analysed using both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. Results: The cohort included 119 patients. AWBC treatment resulted in a significantly higher healing rate compared to the control in both ITT (41% versus 15%, respectively; p=0.002) and PP populations (51% versus 18%, respectively; p=0.0075). AWBC treatment also resulted in a shorter mean time to heal and higher durability of wound closure. Safety analysis showed a similar incidence of adverse events (AEs) between groups, with no device-related AEs. Conclusion: The AWBC system, by modulating the wound microenvironment and providing a functional extracellular matrix, offered a promising new approach to treating hard-to-heal DFUs, demonstrating superior healing outcomes compared to SoC alone in this study.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3