Estimation of wound surface area: an evaluation of medical professionals' assessment in a plastic surgery unit

Abstract

The percentage of skin graft take following the resurfacing of burn injuries is routinely calculated in a subjective fashion, in order to make management decisions. Given the gravity of decisions made based on this clinical assessment of graft check, it is notable that limited research has been carried out on this subject. No standardised subjective assessment tools exist to measure surface area of graft take in a manner similar to that of Wallace's Rule of Nines or Lund and Browder. This study set out to examine the accuracy of visual assessments of graft take within the multidisciplinary team regularly making assessments of newly grafted burn wounds. A total of 15 digitally drawn images were used to assess 36 staff members' estimations of percentage of surface area. The results showed a wide variation in estimation in all staff types, including senior burns surgeons, who were found to underestimate surface area by as much as 30%. The British Burns Association has removed ‘healing time’ as an outcome measurement from its guidance, as it recognises how hard it is to make a standardised assessment of wound healing. This study demonstrates the difficulty in subjectively assessing surface area and makes some suggestions for further research and clinical applications of technology to aid assessment.