Prognostic risk signature in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with hypomethylating agents and venetoclax

Author:

Bataller Alex1,Bazinet Alexandre2,DiNardo Courtney D3ORCID,Maiti Abhishek1,Borthakur Gautam2,Daver Naval G.4ORCID,Short Nicholas J.5ORCID,Jabbour Elias J.6,Issa Ghayas C.1ORCID,Pemmaraju Naveen1ORCID,Yilmaz Musa1,Montalban-Bravo Guillermo1,Takahashi Koichi1,Loghavi Sanam7ORCID,Garcia-Manero Guillermo1,Ravandi Farhad6,Kantarjian Hagop M1,Kadia Tapan M.2

Affiliation:

1. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States

2. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States

3. UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States

4. University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States

5. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States

6. University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States

7. The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States

Abstract

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and venetoclax (Ven) represent the standard of care for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk classifications have been validated in patients treated with intensive therapy. In this study we validate a recently proposed new molecular prognostic risk signature (mPRS) for patients with AML treated with HMAs and Ven. This classification allocated patients to favorable, intermediate (N/KRAS or FLT3-internal tandem duplication mutations) and lower (TP53 mutations) benefit groups. We retrospectively analyzed 159 patients treated with HMA and Ven. The mPRS classification allocated 74 (47%), 31 (19%), and 54 (34%) patients to the higher, intermediate, and lower benefit groups, respectively. The overall response rate was 71% (86%, 54%, and 59% in the higher, intermediate, and lower benefit groups, respectively). The median OS and EFS times were 30 and 19 months, respectively, in the higher benefit group; 12 and 8 months, respectively, in the intermediate benefit group; and 5 and 4 months, respectively, in the lower benefit group (p < .001). The C-index for OS and EFS was higher when stratifying patients according to mPRS classification, compared with the ELN 2022 classification. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 35%, 70%, and 60% in the higher, intermediate, and lower benefit groups, respectively (p = .005). The mPRS classification accurately segregated groups of AML patients treated with HMA plus Ven. In these patients, N/KRAS and TP53 mutations appear to negatively impact outcomes and therefore new treatment approaches are warranted.-

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Hematology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3