International study of treatment efficacy in SS shows superiority of combination therapy and heterogeneity of treatment strategies

Author:

Campbell Belinda A.123ORCID,Dobos Gabor45ORCID,Haider Zahra6,Prince H. Miles27ORCID,Bagot Martine4ORCID,Evison Felicity8,van der Weyden Carrie27ORCID,McCormack Chris910,Ram-Wolff Caroline4,Miladi Maryam4,Scarisbrick Julia J11ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

2. 2Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

3. 3Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

4. 4Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint Louis, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France

5. 5Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany

6. 6Department of Dermatology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom

7. 8Department of Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Australia

8. 7Health Data Science Team, Research Development and Innovation, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom

9. 9Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

10. 11Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

11. 10Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Despite increasing availability of therapies, patients with Sezary syndrome (SS) commonly endure multi-line treatment journeys, mostly with partial responses of short duration. Measuring clinical benefit is challenging; time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) provides a robust, objective measurement of efficacy. This international observational study examines patterns of clinical care and therapeutic benefit as measured by TTNT. TTNT was calculated for monotherapies and combination therapies, with consideration to treatment line. 178 patients with SS (73% de novo, 27% secondary) were included, receiving 721 lines of systemic therapy, with median follow-up of 56.9 months. Across all lines, 58 different therapeutic regimens were prescribed (54 were systemic therapies) and classified into 17 treatment groups. The most common first-line treatments were extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP)–containing combination therapy (20%) and retinoid monotherapy (19%). Median TTNT for all first-line therapies was short (5.4 months). First-line, combination therapies had longer median TTNT than monotherapies, 10.0 vs 5.0 months (P = .004), respectively. Later delivery of combination therapies was associated with shorter clinical benefit, with median TTNT reduced to 6.2 and 2.2 months for mid-line (2nd-4th line) and late-line (≥5th line), respectively (P < .001). First-line ECP-containing treatments were associated with longer median TTNT than non-ECP–containing treatments, 9.0 vs 4.9 months (P = .007). For both ECP-monotherapy and ECP–containing combination therapy, significant reductions in TTNT were seen in later lines. These data suggest therapeutic benefit from first-line delivery of combination therapy for SS and favor early inclusion of ECP in the treatment algorithm for those who can access it.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Hematology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3