Assessment of Average Hematocrit of Red Cell Units for Erythrocytapheresis Procedure in Sickle Cell Disease

Author:

Cook Veronica1,Munson Teresa1,Pena Elpidio2,Raj Ashok3

Affiliation:

1. Norton Children's Hospital, Louisville, KY

2. Norton Healthcare, Louisville, KY

3. University of Louisville, Louisville, KY

Abstract

Abstract Background: Erythrocytapheresis, or red blood cell exchange (RCE) is a non-invasive procedure in which a patient's erythrocytes are removed from the bloodstream while being replaced with erythrocytes from blood donors. RCE is commonly used as a transfusion technique in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) to help treat and prevent complications associated with sickling of erythrocytes and iron overload. The AABB consensus report (1) outlines the procedural guidelines for RCE including appropriate indications and ideal forms of vascular access. However, the guidelines make no recommendation for determining the hematocrit (Hct) of the red cell bags for the procedure. Institutions take several different approaches to determine how many red cell units to exchange. The number of units needed depends on the volume and Hct of the individual units as well as the patient's pre-procedure Hct and HbS levels, height, weight, and the desired HbS and Hct targets. Red cell units are routinely labeled with volume, but are not generally labeled with Hct. The AABB consensus report (1) states that some institutions use an estimated Hct of 56% to 57% for each unit. The report rationalizes the use of an estimated Hct for input for the RCE, by citing the approximated Hct of bags of red cells (55% to 60%) with additive solution produced from whole blood donation, based on limited data. The goal of our study was to determine the average Hct on the red cell units used for RCE. Methods: This study used a retrospective chart review to investigate the Hct of red cell units during a RCE in a calendar year. Our institution uses pre-storage leuko-reduced red blood cells units in citrate phosphate dextrose adenine (CPDA-1) and adsol preservative (AS-1), which are 21 days old or less for RCE. The average Hct of the bags of red cells infused during the procedure was determined by accessing each bag for a small sample of blood to determine the Hct. Data was excluded if the patient did not meet standard weight requirements (> 30 kg) or required additional treatment protocols including the use of washed cells or machine priming. Results: A total of 297 encounters were recorded for 30 different patients. A total of 1953 bags (approximately 517 liters of red cell units in volume) were administered. Data from the encounters were used to calculate measures of central tendency. The average calculated Hct for each encounter was 63.3%, with a median and mode Hct being 63% and 62%. The range of Hct from the bags was 54.6% to 72.9%. The average Hct of the bags ranged from 60.6% (in March) to 64.8 % (in July). Conclusions: Our study suggests a higher average Hct of transfused red cell units than stated in the AABB consensus report (1), which was based on limited data. Our findings indicate that a standardized average of 63.3%, would be appropriate for our institution. Conversely, our findings also signify that the standardized average Hct must be determined in each institution prior to their application for RCE. However, our data also reveals that it is possible to subject patients to estimates as far as 9.7% above and 9.6 % below the true average Hct of the red cell bags used. The process of determination of Hct for each of the red cell units increases the time of pre-service activities, laboratory costs, and the overall infusion center time for the patients leading to higher costs per infusion. Consequently, using a standardized average of the Hct would result in cost savings. We have therefore adopted the practice of using the standardized average of Hct of 63.3% for RCE in our patients. Reference: 1. Biller E, Zhao Y, Berg M, Boggio L, Capocelli KE, Fang DC, Koepsell S, Music-Aplenc L, Pham HP, Treml A, Weiss J, Wool G, Baron BW. Red blood cell exchange in patients with sickle cell disease-indications and management: a review and consensus report by the therapeutic apheresis subsection of the AABB. 2018 Aug;58(8):1965-1972. doi: 10.1111/trf.14806 Disclosures Munson: Terumo Medical Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Raj: Terumo Medical Corporation: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Global biotherapeutics: Speakers Bureau; Forma therapeutics: Consultancy.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3