A Deep Learning-Based Pathomics Methodology for Quantifying and Characterizing Nucleated Cells in the Bone Marrow Microenvironment

Author:

Krichevsky Spencer12,Ouseph Madhu M3,Zhang Yuwei1,Abu-Zeinah Ghaith2,Scandura Joseph M.2,Gupta Rajarsi1

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY

2. 2Richard T. Silver, MD Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

3. 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY

Abstract

Introduction: The overall cellularity of the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment is a WHO criterion for differentiating BCRABL- myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) like polycythemia vera (PV) and myelofibrosis (MF) [1]. However, manual assessment by hematopathologists is subjective, not scalable, and only records a single global measure, disregarding BM regional differences. Leveraging pathology slide scanners and deep learning (DL) can address these limitations and reveal valuable insights into MPN subtypes and treatment effects. Despite its potential, computational pathology (Pathomics) in this area remains understudied [2-3]. Methods: After institutional review from Stony Brook University and Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM), we identified 54 patients (pts) with a manually confirmed PV diagnosis (dx) at WCM (17% newly dx'ed, 61% treated, 17% disease progression). The dataset includes hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) stained whole slide images (WSIs), labs, molecular studies, and pathology report elements (reference standard for biopsy core size and cellularity). Numeric cellularity measures the ratio of hematopoietic cells to fat cells and excludes inevaluable trabecular bone. Normal cellularity ranges from (100-pt age [y])±20% and PV is characterized by hypercellularity. We evaluated three DL algorithms for nuclear segmentation: 1) Our U-Net model trained on 5B nuclei from 10 cancer types [4], 2) HistoCartography (HC): a graph neural network trained on 235K nuclei (PanNuke/MoNuSac datasets) [5], and 3) CellPose (CP): a gradient-driven U-Net model trained on 1K nuclei of varied modalities [6]. A color/morphology-based segmenter identified fat cells and evaluable BM regions, excluding vessels/tissue tears. Cellular characteristics (shape, texture, color) were computed and clustered by k-nearest neighbors (kNN) and k-means to explore differences between PV stages. A tissue-based approach for cellularity estimation derived the proportion of non-fat tissue to evaluable regions. A cell-based approach derived the proportions of nucleated cell and fat cell areas. The study calculated mean differences between biopsy core size estimates, assessed correlation (r) and intra-class correlation (ICC) for numeric cellularity estimates, and Cohen's kappa (κ) for categorical cellularity estimates. Results: Measured and estimated biopsy core sizes differed by an acceptable margin (3±4 mm). Tissue-based cellularity estimator results: r=0.2, ICC=0.0, κ=0.2. Cell-based cellularity estimator result: our approach (r=0.7, ICC=0.6, κ=0.7), HC (r=0.7, ICC=0.5, κ=0.6), and CP (r=0.2, ICC=0.2, κ=0.7). Cell size clusters aligned with known distributions in PV, with the prominent Int1 class (5.1-9μm) likely containing erythrocytes and myeloid progenitors. Overall and cell-sized cellularity heatmaps visualize regional differences (Figure 1). K-means clustering separated new and progressing PV (Figure 2). Discussion: DL and classical image analysis were employed to segment nucleated cells, fat cells, and other evaluable regions of hematopoietic tissue. Extracting shape, texture, and color features from segmented nuclei enhances BM microenvironment characterization. This pilot study resulted in a practical and interpretable Pathomics pipeline and downstream analytics as a proof of concept for hypothesis-driven research. Future directions involve applying these insights to a large cohort of diagnosis WSIs from other MPN subtypes and correlating findings with other tools, like immune cell detection models. References: [1] Arber DA. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391-405. [2] Nielsen FS. Cytometry. 2019;95(10):1066-74. [3] van Eekelen L. Pathology. 2022;54(3):318-27. [4] Hou L. Sci Data. 2020;7(185) [5] Jaume G. PMLR. 2021. [6] Stringer C. Nat Methods. 2021;100-6. [7] Abousamra S. Front Oncol. 2022.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3