A National, Multicenter, Non-Interventional Study of Pomalidomide in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Results from the Miroir Study

Author:

Hulin Cyrille1,Macro Margaret2,Gourgou Sophie3,Lachenal Florence4,Lenoir Caroline Bureau5,Arnulf Bertrand6,Caillot Denis7,Stoppa Anne Marie8,Vincent Laure9,Jaccard Arnaud10,Moreau Philippe11,Perrot Aurore12,Mohty Mohamad13,Karlin Lionel14,Fohrer Cécile15,Eveillard Jean-Richard16,Sylvain Choquet17,Fontan Jean18,Leleu Xavier19,Decaux Olivier20

Affiliation:

1. Hopital De Haut Leveque, Pessac, France

2. Hopital Cote De Nacre, Caen, France

3. Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France

4. Ch Pierre Oudot, Bourgoin Jallieu, France

5. Polyclin Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France

6. Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France

7. Hospital Francois Mitterrand, Dijon, France

8. Institut J Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France

9. Hôpital St Eloi, Montpellier, France

10. Hopital Dupuytren, Limoges, France

11. Hopital Hotel Dieu Et Hme, Nantes, France

12. Hôpitaux De Brabois, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France

13. Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France

14. Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Pierre-Benite, France

15. Hôpital Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France

16. Hôpital Augustin Morvan, Brest, France

17. Gh Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France

18. Service Hematologie, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, Besancon, France

19. Hopital La Miletrie, Service Hématologie, Poitiers, France

20. Chu Rennes, Hôpital Sud, Rennes, France

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Pomalidomide (POM; Imnovid) in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (LoDex) demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS; median, 4.0 vs 1.9 months; P < .0001) and overall survival (OS; median, 12.7 vs 8.1 months; P = .0285) vs high-dose dexamethasone in a phase 3 study of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM; MM-003; San Miguel et al. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1055-1066). This trial led to the European approval of POM + LoDEX in patients with RRMM previously treated with ≥ 2 regimens, including lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT), and who had disease progression on their last therapy. However, data on the use of POM in the real-world setting are limited. The goal of the MIROIR study is to investigate the usage, efficacy, and tolerability of POM in current clinical practice in France. Results from a pre-specified 3-year interim analysis are presented. METHODS MIROIR is a multicenter, non-interventional study of POM in routine clinical practice. Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with multiple myeloma who initiated POM treatment in France between October 1, 2014, and September 30, 2017, were included (data cutoff, February 1, 2018). All patients were required to be enrolled in the Imnovid registry (a non-interventional post-marketing authorization registry) and to provide consent. Key exclusion criteria included previous treatment with POM or simultaneous participation in a clinical trial. Patients were followed up for ≤ 24 months after treatment initiation. Data were collected from patient medical files. The primary endpoint is PFS at 6 months. PFS is defined as the time from POM treatment initiation to the first progression according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria or death from any cause. Key secondary endpoints include OS, time to next treatment (TTNT), and safety. This study is ongoing; targeted enrollment is 3000 patients (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02902900). RESULTS A total of 1581 patients were included in this analysis (median follow-up, 19.1 months). The median age was 69.8 years, and 480 patients (30.4%) were aged ≥ 75 years; 844 patients (53.4%) were male. The median time from first-line treatment to POM initiation was 52.6 months. Patients had received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range, 0-9), with 628 (39.7%), 509 (32.2%), and 444 patients (28.1%) receiving ≤ 2, 3, and ≥ 4 prior lines, respectively. The most common prior treatments included BORT (97.3%), LEN (97.0%), melphalan (80.3%), and autologous/allogeneic stem cell transplant (50.0%). POM was prescribed at 4 mg/day in 923 patients (83.8%) aged < 75 years and in 300 patients (62.5%) aged ≥ 75 years. Dexamethasone was prescribed at 20 mg/day and 40 mg/day in 382 (34.7%) and 566 patients (51.4%) aged < 75 years and at 20 mg/day and 40 mg/day in 287 (59.8%) and 49 patients (10.2%) aged ≥ 75 years. The 6-month PFS rate was 50.5% (95% CI, 47.7%-53.3%). Other key PFS data are reported in the Table. Median TTNT was 9.8 months (95% CI, 9.0-10.6 months). The 12-month OS rate was 68.7% (95% CI, 66.1%-71.0%), with a median OS of 22.4 months (95% CI, 21.0-24.6 months). A total of 233 serious adverse events (AEs) related to POM were reported; 26 (11.2%) were neutropenia, 13 (5.6%) were pancytopenia, and 13 (5.6%) were thrombocytopenia. POM dose was reduced due to an AE in 20.0% of patients; treatment was discontinued or interrupted due to an AE in 14.9% and 35.2% of patients, respectively. Many patients received concomitant treatments and supportive care in the form of thromboprophylaxis (81.2%), antiviral prophylaxis with valacyclovir (63.3%), antibiotic prophylaxis (55.8%), bisphosphonates (20.9%), erythropoietin (20.1%), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (8.8%). CONCLUSIONS The results of this interim analysis of the real-world MIROIR study confirm the efficacy of POM reported in clinical trials and underscore its role as a treatment in RRMM. Median PFS was numerically longer in patients who had received only 1 to 2 prior lines of therapy, supporting earlier initiation of POM. The results also indicate that POM is effective in patients whose disease has relapsed or developed resistance to LEN; PFS outcomes were similar regardless of whether patients had received LEN or another treatment as their most recent therapy. This suggests that there is no need to switch from an immunomodulatory agent to another class of treatment after relapse or resistance to LEN. Disclosures Hulin: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Macro:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial support for congress; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial support for congress; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial support for congress; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial support for congress. Gourgou:Roche: Other: Expertise methodological seminar Force 1 since 2007 and real-life study ; Celgene Corporation: Other: Expertise methodological mirror . Lachenal:Celgene: Other: Scientific Committees . Stoppa:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Moreau:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Perrot:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Mohty:MaaT Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Karlin:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Fohrer:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sylvain:Gilead: Other: scientific advisor board. Leleu:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Janssen: Honoraria, Other; BMS: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Merk: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership steering committee membership ; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Roche: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Karyopharm: Honoraria. Decaux:Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3