First-line therapy with fludarabine compared with chlorambucil does not result in a major benefit for elderly patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Author:

Eichhorst Barbara F.1,Busch Raymonde2,Stilgenbauer Stephan3,Stauch Martina4,Bergmann Manuela A.5,Ritgen Matthias6,Kranzhöfer Nicole7,Rohrberg Robert8,Söling Ulrike9,Burkhard Oswald10,Westermann Anne1,Goede Valentin1,Schweighofer Carmen D.1,Fischer Kirsten1,Fink Anna-Maria1,Wendtner Clemens M.1,Brittinger Günter11,Döhner Hartmut3,Emmerich Bertold12,Hallek Michael1,

Affiliation:

1. Department I of Internal Medicine, Centre of Integrated Oncology Köln Bonn, University of Cologne, Cologne;

2. Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University, Munich;

3. Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, Ulm;

4. Private practice, Kronach;

5. Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Munich;

6. Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel;

7. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Saarland, Homburg;

8. Private practice, Halle;

9. Private practice, Kassel;

10. Private practice, Worms;

11. Department of Hematology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen; and

12. Department of Internal Medicine Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Although chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of elderly patients, subjects older than 65 years are heavily underrepresented in clinical trials. The German CLL study group (GCLLSG) initiated a multicenter phase III trial for CLL patients older than 65 years comparing first-line therapy with fludarabine with chlorambucil. A total of 193 patients with a median age of 70 years were randomized to receive fludarabine (25 mg/m2 for 5 days intravenously, every 28 days, for 6 courses) or chlorambucil (0.4 mg/kg body weight [BW] with an increase to 0.8 mg/kg, every 15 days, for 12 months). Fludarabine resulted in a significantly higher overall and complete remission rate (72% vs 51%, P = .003; 7% vs 0%, P = .011). Time to treatment failure was significantly shorter in the chlorambucil arm (11 vs 18 months; P = .004), but no difference in progression-free survival time was observed (19 months with fludarabine, 18 months with chlorambucil; P = .7). Moreover, fludarabine did not increase the overall survival time (46 months in the fludarabine vs 64 months in the chlorambucil arm; P = .15). Taken together, the results suggest that in elderly CLL patients the first-line therapy with fludarabine alone does not result in a major clinical benefit compared with chlorambucil. This trial is registered with www.isrctn.org under identifier ISRCTN 36294212.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3