A Randomized Controlled Trial of Spiritually-Focused Meditation In Patients Newly Diagnosed with Acute Leukemia.

Author:

Cole Brenda1,Broer Karen2,Hopkins Clare3,Tisak John4,Hunt Ryan1,McNally Chris2,Sekeres Mikkael2,Foon Kenneth A.5,Boyiadzis Michael1

Affiliation:

1. University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,

2. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA,

3. Carlow University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,

4. Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA,

5. Nevada Cancer Institute, Las Vegas, NV, USA

Abstract

Abstract Abstract 1519 Cancer patients view religion and/or spirituality as personally important and addressing the spiritual needs of cancer patients is a critical component of cancer care. Evidence suggests that secularized forms of meditation improve quality of life (QOL) for cancer patients. Integrating patient's religious or spiritual beliefs into meditations may augment these effects on QOL. We conducted a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of spiritually-focused meditation for patients admitted at our institutions with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or acute lymphocytic leukemia. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Ninety-one acute leukemia patients enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to: usual care control (UCC), spiritually-focused meditation (SpM), or secularly-focused meditation (SM). During five 1-hour intervention sessions delivered between admission and discharge, participants were taught secular meditation (SM condition) or spiritually framed meditation (SpM condition). All participants completed outcome measures at the beginning of the study, at discharge, two-, four-, and six-months later. Outcome measures included: The Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), The McGill Quality of Life Scale (MQOL), Positive and Negative Affective States Scale (PANAS Positive and PANAS Negative affect), The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Physical Well-being (FACT-Ph) subscale, Patient Reported Pain Score, and the use of narcotic and non-narcotic analgesics. Forty-two participants (17 UCC, 13 SpM, 12 SM) who remained in the study through the follow-up period were assessable for analysis. The levels of depression for SpM (p = 0.04) and SM (p = 0.001) decreased significantly across assessment points while levels of depression for UCC remained constant. There was interaction of time and FACT-Ph (F (8, 156)=2.01; p= 0.05). Post hoc analyses indicated that this was accounted for by differences between the UCC and SpM participants at the 6 month follow-up. SpM participants reported more physical health symptoms than the UCC participants even though there were no significant differences in complete remission rates among the three groups. There was a significant group effect for PANAS negative affect in that the SM participants (X= 2.15) reported more negative affect than the UCC participants (X = 1.66), averaged across assessment points. There were no other interactive effects for any of the other outcome measures. The use of narcotic and non-narcotic analgesics and Pain Scores were similar across all three groups. Minutes of meditation or relaxation practice was related to lower CES-D scores (p = 0.02) at admission prior to intervention participation, and was related to greater perceived social support as assessed by the MQOL (p = 0.05) at discharge. Frequency of practice was associated with MQOL Existential subscale (p = 0.05), MQOL psychological subscale (p = 0.05), CES-D (p =0.01), and PANAS Positive (p < .01), at the 4 month assessment. In conclusion, these results suggest that meditation programs, secularly or spiritually framed, are beneficial for acute leukemia patients who are hospitalized for initial induction chemotherapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3