Deferiprone Is Associated with Lower Serum Ferritin (SF) Relative to Liver Iron Concentration (LIC) Than Deferoxamine and Deferasirox- Implications for Clinical Practice

Author:

Ang Ai Leen1,Shah Farrukh T1,Davis Bernard A1,Thomas Alison2,Murugachandran Govin3,Kumuradevan Jeevan3,Garbowksi Maciej W2,Porter John B4

Affiliation:

1. Haematology, The Whittington Hospital, London, United Kingdom,

2. Haematology, University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom,

3. Radiology, The Whittington Hospital, London, United Kingdom,

4. Haematology, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Abstract 4246 Introduction Serum ferritin (SF) is typically used as a surrogate marker for body iron load in thalassemia major (TM) patients. SF is useful as it can be regularly and inexpensively measured, allowing early trend recognition in chelation management. Various guidelines have recommended target SFs for TM patients, regardless of the prescribed chelator. The emergence of non-invasive LIC determinations has now allowed us to examine whether relationships between SF and LIC vary with chelator. Any differences in this relationship among chelators can have important implications for treatment guidelines. Methods We assessed whether the relationship between LIC measured by Ferriscan® (LIC-R2) and ferritin (using most recent SF within 3 months of LIC-R2 and mean SF in the year prior to LIC-R2 (SFmean)) varied according to chelators. TM patients (n=84), mean age 33 (±10) years, who were compliant and continuously on one chelation modality for > 1 year prior to LIC-R2 were retrospectively analysed. Chelation regimes included deferoxamine (DFO) (n=17), deferasirox (DFX) (n=47) or deferiprone (DFP) (n=23). The following patients were excluded: those with rheumatological diseases, HCV-RNA+ hepatitis, steatohepatitis and recent infections to minimize confounders of SF elevation; those on combination DFO and DFP due to their highly variable DFO frequencies; those with LIC >43mg/g dw as their LICs could not be reliably quantified. Results Patients had received a median of 10 (1-33), 1.5 (1-4) and 8 (1-19) years of DFO, DFX and DFP respectively prior to LIC-R2. Baseline characteristics were not significantly (sig) different among chelator groups (P>0.25): 51% had splenectomy; SF was determined at a median of 11(0-55) days from LIC-R2. The 3 chelator groups had similar median LICs (P=0.99) but DFP patients had sig lower median SF and SFmean than DFO (P=0.00) and DFX (P<0.01) patients (Table). This was observed across clinically relevant LIC thresholds of <3.2, 3.2–7 and >7 mg/g dw (P<0.05; DFP vs DFO and DFX). For high LICs associated with increased cardiac risk (>15mg/g dw), the median of DFP patients' SFmean was only 2529 (1776-2734) μg/L, which had a tendency to be less than that of DFX patients (median 4563 (1761-6871) μg/L, P=0.09) despite similar median LICs (P= 0.71). These were reflected by a lower median SF/LIC ratio in DFP than DFO (P=0.00) and DFX (P=0.00). Linear regressions of LIC vs SF were then compared between different chelators for SF <4000μg/L and LIC ≤ 20 mg/g dw as the best linear correlations were observed for these values across all 3 chelators. DFP's linear regression line (LIC =(0.0043 ±0.0011) × SF+ (0.74 ± 1.63), R =0.65) was sig different from DFO's (LIC =(0.0025 ±0.0010) × SF + (-0.55 ±2.28), R =0.58, P =0.00) and DFX's (LIC =(0.0022 ±0.0004) × SF +(0.55 ±0.75), R =0.69, P =0.047). DFP had higher predicted LICs at various SF compared to DFO and DFX (table). DFO was not sig different from DFX for the above parameters. Conclusions Once patients are stabilized on >1 year of a given chelator, the relationship between LIC and SF shows differences among chelators, especially for SF <4000μg/L and LIC ≤20 mg/g dw. Patients on DFP monotherapy will tend to have higher LICs at any given SF in this range than those on DFO or DFX. About half of our DFP patients had LIC >15mg/g dw despite SFmean <2500μg/L. As SF <4000μg/L mainly reflects reticuloendothelial (RE) rather than hepatocellular iron, these are consistent with a preferential removal of RE compared with hepatocyte iron by DFP, likely due to its rapid inactivation by glucuronidation within the hepatocyte, while DFO and DFX have a relative trophism for hepatocellular iron. These findings suggest that for chelation involving DFP, the SF trend may not reflect the LIC in the same way as with DFO or DFX, emphasizing the value of LIC monitoring in addition to SF. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Deferiprone, an oral iron chelator, is an off-label medication in North America. Shah:Swedish Orphan/Apotex: Honoraria; Norvatis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Porter:Norvatis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3