Somatic Mutations in MDS Patients Are Associated with Clinical Features and Predict Prognosis Independent of the IPSS-R: Analysis of Combined Datasets from the International Working Group for Prognosis in MDS-Molecular Committee

Author:

Bejar Rafael1,Papaemmanuil Elli2,Haferlach Torsten3,Garcia-Manero Guillermo4,Maciejewski Jaroslaw P.5,Sekeres Mikkael A.6,Walter Matthew J.7,Graubert Timothy A.8,Cazzola Mario9,Malcovati Luca10,Ogawa Seishi11,Fenaux Pierre12,Hellstrom-Lindberg Eva13,Kern Wolfgang3,Boultwood Jacqueline14,Pellagatti Andrea15,Bowen David16,Tauro Sudhir17,Groves Michael J18,Vyas Paresh19,Quek Lynn20,Nazha Aziz21,Thol Felicitas22,Heuser Michael23,Shih Lee-Yung24,Padron Eric25,Sallman David26,Komrokji Rami S.27,List Alan F.28,Santini Valeria29,Fontenay Michaela30,Campbell Peter J31,Tüchler Heinz32,Stevenson Kristen33,Neuberg Donna S33,Greenberg Peter34,Ebert Benjamin L35

Affiliation:

1. UCSD Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA

2. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York,

3. MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany

4. Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Houston, TX

5. Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Taussing Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

6. Leukemia Program, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

7. Dept of Medicine, Div of Oncology, Washington Univ. in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO

8. Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

9. Department of Hematology Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

10. Department of Hematology Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Pavia, Italy

11. Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

12. Service d'Hématologie Séniors, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Université Paris 7, Paris, France

13. Dept. of Med., Div. of Hem., Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

14. LRF Molecular Haematology Unit, NDCLS, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom

15. University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

16. St. James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, United Kingdom

17. Division of Cancer Research, Dundee School of Medicine, Dundee, United Kingdom

18. Dept of Haematology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, United Kingdom

19. MRC Molecular Haematology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine and Department of Haematology, University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK, Oxford, United Kingdom

20. Haematology, London, United Kingdom

21. Leukemia Program, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH

22. Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

23. Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and SCT, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

24. Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, College of Medicine Chang Gung University, Taipei, Taiwan

25. Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL

26. Dept. of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

27. Malignant Hematology Department, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL

28. Department of Hematologic Malignancies, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

29. AOU Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

30. Cochin Hospital, University Paris 5, Paris, France

31. Cancer genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom

32. Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Leukemia Resaerch, Vienna, Austria

33. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

34. Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

35. Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Abstract

Abstract Background Somatic mutations identified in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are associated with disease features and carry prognostic information independent of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and the revised IPSS (IPSS-R). Risk models that include mutation information have been proposed, but not widely adopted. In practice, there is no consensus on how to best combine clinical information with tumor sequencing data to predict prognosis. To accomplish this, we must define the relevant genes to consider and accurately measure their prognostic impact. Here we examine the relationship between mutations in MDS-associated genes and clinically relevant measures, including overall survival, in a large, multi-center analysis of MDS patient cohorts collected around the globe. Methods Data on 3392 MDS patients gathered by members of the International Working Group for Prognosis in MDS-Molecular Committee were combined under the aegis of the MDS Foundation. Patients gave informed consent for collection of their data and tumor samples at their respective institutions in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Samples were examined for somatic mutations primarily by next generation sequencing. Categorical variables were compared using a chi-squared test, while continuous variables were compared using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of the sequenced sample to the date of death and was censored at transplant or the last known follow-up time. P-values are two-sided and considered significant at the <0.001 level to adjust for multiple comparisons. Results Survival data were available for 3200 patients with a median follow up of 3.7 years and included 1671 deaths. Median survival of the cohort was 2.88 years. The 27 genes sequenced in at least half of the cohort and mutated in > 1.5% of samples were included for analysis (Figure 1). Mutations in 12 genes were strongly associated with shorter OS in univariate analyses (p<0.001 for each gene): ASXL1, CBL, EZH2, IDH2, NF1, NRAS, PTPN11, RUNX1, SRSF2, STAG2, TP53, and U2AF1. Only mutations of SF3B1 were associated with a longer OS at this significance threshold. The large size of the cohort allowed for more precise estimates of survival in less frequently mutated genes. For example, mutations of IDH2 (present in 3.4% of cases, n=103) were associated with shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-2.05; p=0.0001) whereas IDH1 mutations (present in 2.4% of cases, n=77) were only marginal (HR 1.29, CI: 0.97-1.72; p=0.082), demonstrating the distinct impact of mutations in these highly related genes. IPSS-R risk groups could be determined for 2173 patients and were strongly associated with OS. Adjusting the hazard ratio of death for IPSS-R risk groups identified several mutated genes with independent prognostic significance: TP53 (HR 2.37, CI 1.94-2.90), CBL (HR 1.57, CI 1.22-2.03), EZH2 (HR 1.55, CI 1.22-2.03), and RUNX1 (HR 1.50, CI 1.24-1.83). Mutations of U2AF1 (HR 1.29, CI 1.06-1.58) and ASXL1 (HR 1.21, CI 1.04-1.41) retained a more modest association with shorter OS. Adjustment for IPSS-R risk groups also moderated the favorable risk associated with mutations of SF3B1 (HR 0.83, CI 0.70-0.99). Patients without mutations in any of the 6 adverse genes above represented 58% of the fully sequenced cohort and had a longer median survival than patients with adverse mutations (4.8 years vs. 1.6 years respectively, p < 0.0001; Figure 2) even after correction for IPSS-R risk groups (adjusted HR 0.59, CI 0.51-0.67). Multivariable analysis of this dataset will examine the combined contribution of mutated genes to prognosis. A mutation score based on survival risk will be proposed and internally validated. The impact of somatic mutation in patients traditionally considered lower risk will be explored. Conclusions This large study definitively validates the prognostic value of mutations in several MDS-associated genes while clarifying the significance of other, less frequently mutated ones. Mutations in several genes retain their prognostic significance after adjustment for IPSS-R risk groups, indicating that these select abnormalities could refine the prediction of prognosis when incorporated into a clinical scoring system such as the IPSS-RM. The results of this analysis will serve as the template with which to build an integrated molecular risk model for MDS. Disclosures Bejar: Alexion: Other: ad hoc advisory board; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genoptix Medical Laboratory: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: MDS prognostic gene signature. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sekeres:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fenaux:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kern:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shih:Novartis: Research Funding. Komrokji:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacylics: Speakers Bureau. List:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Santini:celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Onconova: Honoraria, Research Funding. Campbell:14M genomics: Other: Co-founder and consultant. Ebert:Celgene: Consultancy; Genoptix: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; H3 Biomedicine: Consultancy.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3