Oprozomib, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone (OPomd) in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): Initial Results of a Phase 1b Study (NCT01999335)

Author:

Shah Jatin1,Niesvizky Ruben2,Stadtmauer Edward3,Rifkin Robert M.4,Berenson James5,Berdeja Jesus G.6,Sharman Jeff P.7,Lyons Roger8,Klippel Zandra9,Wong Hansen9,Chang Yu-Lin9,Usmani Saad10

Affiliation:

1. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

2. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY

3. University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

4. US Oncology Research and Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO

5. Institute for Myeloma & Bone Cancer Research, West Hollywood, CA

6. Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN

7. US Oncology Network/Willamette Valley Cancer Institute, Springfield, OR

8. US Oncology Research and Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX

9. Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an Amgen subsidiary, South San Francisco, CA

10. Levine Cancer Institute/Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, NC

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Oprozomib (OPZ), an oral, irreversible proteasome inhibitor, has shown activity in RRMM pts (Vij, Haematologica 2015;100[suppl 1]:abst P646; Hari, Haematologica 2015;100[suppl 1]:abst P653). Herein we present initial results of the phase 1b portion of a multicenter, phase 1b/3 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the combination of OPZ, pomalidomide (POM), and dexamethasone (DEX) in pts with RRMM. Methods: Pts with RRMM (≥2 prior regimens) were eligible; pts must have received ≥2 consecutive cycles of both bortezomib (BTZ) and either lenalidomide or thalidomide. Prior carfilzomib (CFZ) was allowed if CFZ was not discontinued due to an adverse event (AE). Pts received OPZ orally once-daily on days (D) 1-5 and 15-19 (ie, 5/14 schedule) or on D1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, 23 (ie, 2/7 schedule) of 28-day cycles. Pts received POM orally on D1-21 and DEX 20 mg orally on D1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, 23. The starting OPZ dose in the 5/14 schedule was 150 mg/day and in the 2/7 schedule was 210 mg/day; subsequent escalation was in a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation schema. The starting POM dose for both schedules was 4 mg. If the starting dose cohorts exceeded the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of OPZ within the OPomd regimen, POM doses were to be reduced to 3 mg or 2 mg in subsequent cohorts. OPomd was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective of the phase 1b portion is to determine the MTD and recommended phase 3 dose (RP3D) of OPZ in the OPomd regimen and evaluate the safety and tolerability of the regimen. Secondary objectives include estimating the overall response rate (≥partial response) and clinical benefit rate (≥minimal response), and evaluating OPZ pharmacokinetics (PK). Results: As of June 26, 2015, 31 pts were enrolled (5/14 schedule, n=4; 2/7 schedule, n=17 and n=10 for the expansion arm). This abstract will focus on the escalation portion of the study (n=21); data from the expansion cohort will be updated at the time of the meeting. In the 5/14 schedule, pts received OPZ 150 mg/day + POM 4 mg/day (n=3); or OPZ 150 mg/day + POM 2 mg/day (n=1). In the 2/7 schedule, pts received OPZ 210 mg/day + POM 4 mg/day (n=7); or OPZ 240 mg/day + POM 4 mg/day (n=10). Median age was 57 yr (5/14 schedule) and 66 yr (2/7 schedule). Pts received a median of 8 prior regimens (range, 2-22) in the 5/14 schedule and 4.5 prior regimens (range, 2-11) in the 2/7 schedule. Four pts (100%) and 8 pts (47%) in the 5/14 and 2/7 schedules, respectively, received CFZ in their last prior regimen. In the 5/14 and 2/7 schedules, 50% and 76% of pts were BTZ-refractory, 25% and 41% were CFZ-refractory, and 100% and 82% were refractory to an immunomodulatory agent, respectively. At the time of data cutoff, pts in the 5/14 and 2/7 schedules had been on treatment for a median duration of 9.2 wk (range, 3.3-28.0) and 15.6 wk (range, 3.3-40.3) for all study drugs, respectively. For OPZ specifically, the median duration of treatment was 9.0 wk (range, 2.7-27.6) and 15.6 wk (range, 3.3-40.3) in the 5/14 and 2/7 schedules, respectively. Three dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported in 2 pts in the 5/14 schedule (OPZ 150 mg/day + POM 4 mg/day + DEX 20 mg/day cohort): 1 pt had grade (Gr) 3 mucositis and 1 pt had Gr 3 abdominal distention and Gr 3 impaired cognitive function. One DLT occurred in the 2/7 schedule: 1 pt had Gr 3 gastric hemorrhage with severe erosive gastritis identified in endoscopy (OPZ 210 mg/day + POM 4 mg/day + DEX 20 mg/day cohort). The most common AEs of any Gr and of Gr ≥3 are shown in Table 1. One pt in the 5/14 schedule (25%) and 2 pts (12%) in the 2/7 schedule had a dose withdrawn due to an AE. No pts died on study. In the 5/14 schedule, a partial response or better was reported in 2 pts (50%) in the 5/14 schedule and in 10 pts (59%) in the 2/7 schedule (Table 2). Considering current measures of variability and sample size, the PK of OPZ, when given in combination with POM and DEX, were generally consistent with previous OPZ studies. Conclusions: Initial results from this ongoing phase 1b study suggest that the combination of OPomd has encouraging anti-myeloma activity and is generally well tolerated; the most common Gr ≥3 AEs observed in the study were anemia and diarrhea (n=4 each; 24%) in the 2/7 schedule. No Gr ≥3 AE occurred in more than 1 pt in the 5/14 schedule. While the MTD was not defined on either schedule, the 2/7 schedule at 210 mg dose of OPZ was chosen for the expansion cohort based on the safety and efficacy data available. Disclosures Shah: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Stadtmauer:Amgen/Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rifkin:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Berdeja:Onyx: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Sharman:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Calistoga: Honoraria. Lyons:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Insyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Klippel:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wong:Amgen/Onyx: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chang:Onyx: Employment. Usmani:Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3