Central Venous Access Device (CVAD) Use and Complications in Sickle Cell Disease Patients from Medicaid and Commercially-Insured U.S. Populations

Author:

Maserejian Nancy1,Hayflinger Cortney1,Eaton Susan1,Madigan Catherine1,Hobbs William E.1

Affiliation:

1. Biogen, Cambridge, MA

Abstract

Abstract Central venous access devices (CVADs), such as tunneled central venous catheters (tCVADs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), help provide essential care for some patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). CVADs facilitate administration of multiple intravenous (IV) medications and blood products, as well as blood draws for laboratory analysis. Understanding CVAD use and complications is particularly relevant for SCD patients because of their high risk of having insufficient peripheral IV access. Prior studies describing CVAD use and complications in SCD patients were limited by small sample sizes, typically including 15-20 SCD patients in a single treatment center. The resulting estimates for CVAD use and complications in SCD patients vary widely, are insufficient for development of evidence-based guidelines, and may not be representative of the treatment burden in the broader SCD population. The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency of CVAD use and CVAD-associated complications among SCD patients in a large US population sample. We used data from two large U.S. insurance claims databases from Truven Health MarketScan® Research to examine both Medicaid-insured and commercially-insured SCD patients. From January 2009 through December 2013, these databases encompassed over 14 million Medicaid-insured and over 116 million commercially-insured patients. SCD patients were defined as patients with at least two International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) diagnosis codes for SCD (282.41-42, 282.6x) on separate dates in excess of sickle cell trait codes, or one ICD-9 code for an inpatient (emergency department or hospitalization) visit with sickle cell crisis. CVAD insertions were identified using relevant procedure codes for tCVADs or PICCs. We conducted two sets of analyses for each database: (1) per patient among those with at least one CVAD insertion, and (2) per CVAD insertion. We conducted descriptive analyses on the frequency of CVAD-related procedures (e.g., repair, replacement, removal of obstructive material, repositioning), complications, and infections, thromboses, or phlebitis. A total 17,119 Medicaid-insured SCD patients and 21,342 commercially-insured SCD patients were observed for an average of 3-4 years, during which 1,945 (11.4%) and 1,316 (6.2%) patients, respectively, had at least one CVAD insertion. Most SCD patients (80%) were aged >18 y at time of first CVAD insertion; 18% of adult Medicaid SCD patients had at least one CVAD inserted. The mean number of CVAD insertions per patient was 3.1 (Medicaid) and 2.4 (commercially-insured). In the per CVAD analysis, complication claims were frequent, including infection (31-37%), thrombosis (4-5%), and phlebitis/thrombophlebitis (12-15%). The mean time to removal of CVADs (duration) was 31-34 days (PICC lines) and 102 days (tCVADs). In the per patient analysis, 54.3% had infection claims, 24.3% had thrombosis claims, and 10.2% had phlebitis/thrombophlebitis claims in Medicaid (see Table and Figure; additional results to be provided, also stratified by age). Both tCVADs and PICCs were commonly used in SCD patients, particularly adults, with high occurrence of infection, thrombosis and phlebitis/thrombophlebitis, as well as repeated CVAD insertions. Determinants of CVAD use and complications warrant further investigation to inform practice standards. These findings from a large observational study indicate that device-related risks of administering IV treatments are limitations of IV treatment options and may add to SCD treatment burden. Table 1. Medicaid-Insured Commercially-Insured Any CVAD (Overall) PICC Only tCVAD Only Both PICC and tCVAD Any CVAD (Overall) PICC Only tCVAD Only Both PICC and tCVAD N (%) 1,945 681 (35.0%) 893 (45.9%) 371 (19.1%) 1,316 450 (34.2%) 664 (50.5%) 202 (15.3%) Age, mean (sd) y 30.0 (16.3) 34.2 (14.9) 26.9 (17.5) 30.1 (13.6) 32.6 (17.1) 34.1 (15.8) 31.3 (18.3) 33.2 (15.9) CVAD insertions per patient, mean (sd) 3.1 (3.9) 3.1 (3.9) 1.8 (1.3) 6.2 (5.8) 2.4 (2.3) 2.5 (2.6) 1.6 (1.0) 4.5 (2.9) CVAD insertions total 6,107 3,651 2,456 n/a 3,082 1,636 1,446 n/a Duration per CVAD, median days 44 31 102 n/a 53 34 102 n/a CVAD complications, % patients with CVAD Complication, general 28.8% 13.2% 31.8% 50.1% 22.3% 9.1% 25.9% 39.6% Removal of obstructive material 11.2% 3.8% 15.3% 14.6% 9.0% 2.4% 11.4% 15.3% Replacement 8.3% 3.7% 10.2% 12.4% 6.5% 3.8% 6.5% 12.9% Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Maserejian: Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hayflinger:Biogen: Consultancy, Employment. Eaton:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Madigan:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hobbs:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3