An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices

Author:

Chassang Gauthier1234,Thomsen Mogens1234,Rumeau Pierre45,Sèdes Florence46,Delfin Alejandra124

Affiliation:

1. Inserm, UMR1295, CERPOP, Team BIOETHICS, F-31000, Toulouse, France. E-mails: gauthier.chassang@gmail.com, mogens.thomsen@univ-tlse3.fr, aledelfinrossaro@gmail.com

2. Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse 3, UMR1295, CERPOP, F-31000, Toulouse, France

3. Ethics and Biosciences Platform (Genotoul Societal), GIS Genotoul, Toulouse, France

4. Unesco Chair: Ethics, Science et Society, Working group: Digital and Robotics Ethics, Université Fédérale de Toulouse (UFT), France

5. Groupement d’Intérêt Public e.santé Occitanie, Toulouse, France. E-mail: pierre.rumeau@esante-occitanie.fr

6. IRIT-CNRS, Toulouse, France. E-mail: Florence.Sedes@irit.fr

Abstract

We propose a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts of AI coming from different disciplines: Psychology and engineering tackle the notion of intelligence, while ethics and law intend to regulate AI innovations. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems. Relevant concepts are integrated into a matrix intended to help defining more precisely when and how computing tools (programs or devices) may be qualified as AI while highlighting critical features to serve a specific technical, ethical and legal assessment of challenges in AI development. Some adaptations of existing notions of AI characteristics are proposed. The matrix is a risk-based conceptual model designed to allow an empirical, flexible and scalable qualification of AI technologies in the perspective of benefit-risk assessment practices, technological monitoring and regulatory compliance: it offers a structured reflection tool for stakeholders in AI development that are engaged in responsible research and innovation.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Artificial Intelligence

Reference63 articles.

1. L.W. Anderson, D.R. Krathwohl and B.S. Bloom, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Allyn & Bacon, 2001.

2. Association for Computing Machinery’s (ACM) Committee On Professional Ethics (COPE), Code of Ethics. Ed. 2018.

3. Working memory;Baddeley;Current Biology,2010

4. Evaluation objective de la dimension handicapante de l’autisme de l’enfant et de l’adolescent;Blanchon;Neuropsychiatr Enfance Adolesc,1998

5. Niveau de dépendance des enfants et adolescents porteurs d’autisme. Suivi longitudinal à cinq ans;Blanchon;Neuropsychiatr Enfance Adolesc,2001

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Design thinking and artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review exploring synergies;International Journal of Innovation Studies;2024-09

2. Reflexiones sobre la mente: de la filosofía a la neurofisiología;Lógoi. Revista de Filosofía;2024-03-19

3. Improvement Path of Legal System Related to ChatGPT Application Combined with Decision Tree Algorithm;Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences;2024-01-01

4. Work, Life, and Artificial Intelligence (AI): Emerging Findings from Asia;Palgrave Studies in Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Indigenization in Business;2024

5. Ethical Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Educational Assessments;Creative AI Tools and Ethical Implications in Teaching and Learning;2023-12-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3