Retention of Study Partners in Longitudinal Studies of Alzheimer Disease

Author:

Bollinger Rebecca M.1,Gabel Matthew23,Coble Dean W.13,Chen Szu-Wei1,Keleman Audrey A.1,Doralus Jeff4,Chin Erin5,Lingler Jennifer H.67,Grill Joshua D.8,Stark Susan L.13,Edwards Dorothy F.59

Affiliation:

1. Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

2. Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

3. Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

4. Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA

5. University of Wisconsin – Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA

6. University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

7. Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

8. Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, Departments of Psychiatry & Human Behavior and Neurobiology & Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

9. Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA

Abstract

Background: Study partners are required for all participants at Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers (ADRCs). Study partners’ attitudes and beliefs may contribute to missed visits and negatively impact retention of participants in longitudinal AD studies. Objective: Study partners (N = 212) of participants (Clinical Dementia Rating® [CDR]≤2) at four ADRCs were randomly surveyed to examine their facilitators and barriers to continued participation in AD studies. Methods: Reasons for participation were analyzed with factor analysis and regression analysis. Effects of complaints and goal fulfillment on attendance were estimated with fractional logistic models. Open-ended responses were characterized with a Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic model. Results: Study partners participated for personal benefit and altruism. They emphasized personal benefits more when their participants had a CDR > 0 than when they had a CDR = 0. This difference declined with participant age. The majority of study partners rated their ADRC participation as positive and meeting their goals. Although half reported at least one complaint, very few regretted participating. Those who reported that ADRC participation fulfilled their goals or had fewer complaints were more likely to have perfect attendance. Study partners requested more feedback about test results and better management of study visits. Conclusion: Study partners are motivated by both personal and altruistic goals. The salience of each goal depends on their trust in researchers and the participant’s cognitive status and age. Retention may improve with perceived goal fulfillment and fewer complaints. Potential areas for improving retention are providing more information about the participant’s test results and better management of study visits.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3