Delayed and More Variable Unimanual and Bimanual Finger Tapping in Alzheimer’s Disease: Associations with Biomarkers and Applications for Classification

Author:

Koppelmans Vincent12,Ruitenberg Marit F.L.34,Schaefer Sydney Y.5,King Jace B.6,Hoffman John M.7,Mejia Amanda F.8,Tasdizen Tolga9,Duff Kevin1011

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

2. Huntsman Mental Health Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

3. Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands

4. Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, the Netherlands

5. School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

6. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

7. Center for Quantitative Cancer Imaging, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

8. Department of Statistics, University of Indiana, Bloomington, IN, USA

9. School of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

10. Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

11. Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA

Abstract

Background: Despite reports of gross motor problems in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), fine motor function has been relatively understudied. Objective: We examined if finger tapping is affected in AD, related to AD biomarkers, and able to classify MCI or AD. Methods: Forty-seven cognitively normal, 27 amnestic MCI, and 26 AD subjects completed unimanual and bimanual computerized tapping tests. We tested 1) group differences in tapping with permutation models; 2) associations between tapping and biomarkers (PET amyloid-β, hippocampal volume, and APOE ɛ4 alleles) with linear regression; and 3) the predictive value of tapping for group classification using machine learning. Results: AD subjects had slower reaction time and larger speed variability than controls during all tapping conditions, except for dual tapping. MCI subjects performed worse than controls on reaction time and speed variability for dual and non-dominant hand tapping. Tapping speed and variability were related to hippocampal volume, but not to amyloid-β deposition or APOE ɛ4 alleles. Random forest classification (overall accuracy = 70%) discriminated control and AD subjects, but poorly discriminated MCI from controls or AD. Conclusions: MCI and AD are linked to more variable finger tapping with slower reaction time. Associations between finger tapping and hippocampal volume, but not amyloidosis, suggest that tapping deficits are related to neuropathology that presents later during the disease. Considering that tapping performance is able to differentiate between control and AD subjects, it can offer a cost-efficient tool for augmenting existing AD biomarkers.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3