Feminist perspectives to artificial intelligence: Comparing the policy frames of the European Union and Spain

Author:

Guevara-Gómez Ariana,de Zárate-Alcarazo Lucía O.,Criado J. Ignacio

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a disruptive technology that has gained interest among scholars, politicians, public servants, and citizens. In the debates on its advantages and risks, issues related to gender have arisen. In some cases, AI approaches depict a tool to promote gender equality, and in others, a contribution to perpetuating discrimination and biases. We develop a theoretical and analytical framework, combining the literature on technological frames and gender theory to better understand the gender perspective of the nature, strategy, and use of AI in two institutional contexts. Our research question is: What are the assumptions, expectations and knowledge of the European Union institutions and Spanish government on AI regarding gender? Methodologically, we conducted a document analysis of 23 official documents about AI issued by the European Union (EU) and Spain to understand how they frame the gender perspective in their discourses. According to our analysis, despite both the EU and Spain have developed gender-sensitive AI policy frames, doubts remain about the definitions of key terms and the practical implementation of their discourses.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Communication,Information Systems

Reference71 articles.

1. Allen, R., & Masters, D. (2020). Regulating for an equal AI: A new role for equality bodies Meeting the new challenges to equality and non-discrimination from increased digitisation and the use of Artificial Intelligence. Equinet. https://equineteurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ai_report_digital.pdf.

2. Ahmed, S., & Swan, E. (2006). Doing Diversity. Policy Futures in Education], 4(2), 96-100. doi: 10.2304/pfie.2006.4.2.96. aaa(000) Avila, R., Brandusescu, A., Ortiz, J., & Thakur, T. (2018). Artificial Intelligence: open questions about gender inclusion. http:// webfoundation.org/docs/2018/06/AI-Gender.pdf. aaa(000) Berg, A.-J., & Lie, M. (1995). Feminism and Constructivism: Do Artifacts Have Gender? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 20(3), 332-351. doi: 10.1177/016224399502000304. aaa(000) Bimber, B. (2000). Measuring the gender gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 81(3), 868-876. aaa(000) Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J. Y., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. T. (2016). Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings. 30th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2016), Barcelona, Spain. https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2016/file/a486cd07e4ac3d270571622f4f316ec5-Paper.pdf. aaa(000) Bowen, G. (2009). Document Analysis as Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027. aaa(000) Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 1-15.

3. Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases;Caliskan;Science,2017

4. Camilli, G. (2005). Test fairness. In R. Brennan (Ed.), Educational Measurement. American Council on Education/Praeger, pp. 221-256.

5. ‘Artificial Intelligence and the “Good Society”: the US, EU, and UK approach’;Cath;Science and Engineering Ethics,2018

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3