Author:
Li Kuo,Wang Aimin,Wang Limin,Fan Hangqi,Zhang Shuai
Abstract
The independence assumptions help Bayesian network classifier (BNC), e.g., Naive Bayes (NB), reduce structure complexity and perform surprisingly well in many real-world applications. Semi-naive Bayesian techniques seek to improve the classification performance by relaxing the attribute independence assumption. However, the study of dependence rather than independence has received more attention during the past decade and the validity of independence assumptions needs to be further explored. In this paper, a novel learning technique, called Adaptive Independence Thresholding (AIT), is proposed to automatically identify the informational independence and probabilistic independence. AIT can respectively tune the network topologies of BNC learned from training data and testing instance under the framework of target learning. Zero-one loss, bias, variance and conditional log likelihood are introduced to compare the classification performance in the experimental study. The extensive experimental results on a collection of 36 benchmark datasets from the UCI machine learning repository show that AIT is more effective than other learning techniques (such as structure extension, attribute weighting) and helps make the final BNCs achieve remarkable classification improvements.
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Theoretical Computer Science
Reference42 articles.
1. A survey on Bayesian network structure learning from data;Scanagatta;Progress in Artificial Intelligence,2019
2. Opinion analysis for emotional classification on emoji tweets using the naive bayes algorithm;Sendari;Knowledge Engineering and Data Science,2020
3. J. He, Y. Zhang and X. Li, Bayesian classifiers for positive unlabeled learning, in: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Web-Age Information Management, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 81–93.
4. K.M.A. Chai, H.L. Chieu and H.T. Ng, Bayesian online classifiers for text classification and filtering, in: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2002, pp. 97–104.
5. O. Brain and C. Cotton, Explanation and Justification in Machine Learning: A Survey, in: Proceedings of the 17th IJCAI Explainable AI (XAI) Workshop, Melbourne, Australia, 2017, pp. 8–13.