Practices of sickle cell disease genetic screening and testing in the prenatal population

Author:

Prince A.1,Cruz-Bendezú A.1,Gunawansa N.1,Wade J.1,Coleman-Cowger V. H.2,Schulkin J.3,Macri C. J.4

Affiliation:

1. The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA

2. The Emmes Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA

3. Pregnancy-Related Care Research Network (PRCRN), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genetic screening and testing are technologies historically underutilized in Black populations despite predicting diseases like sickle cell disease (SCD), which is predominantly found in Blacks. We surveyed prenatal patients to understand choices, beliefs and experiences surrounding genetic screening and testing, specifically for SCD. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed 322 women during prenatal visits. Responses were analyzed to identify barriers to care and education about testing and screening for SCD. Patients rated whether they agreed or disagreed with statements regarding sickle cell health behaviors. We used χ2 tests to compare categorical variables by self-reported race. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratios and confidence intervals for each outcome. RESULTS: Women were a mean (SD) age of 33.3 (6.1). 42.9% of patients self-identified as White while 41.3% of patients self- identified as Black. Screening questions were adjusted for differences in race, insurance, and education levels to show significant differences in responses between Blacks and Whites for screening for SCD (p = 0.047, OR 95% CI = 0.455 [0.210–0.989]) and plans to meet with genetic counselors (p = 0.049, OR 95% CI = 0.299 [0.090–0.993]). The statements “if sickle cell is not in their family, then it is likely not in themselves or their children,” was significantly different between Black and White populations (p = 0.011, OR 95% CI = 0.207 [0.081–0.526]). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest gaps in screening, testing, education, and pregnancy management choices between Black and White patients. Research should focus on decreasing these healthcare gaps and improving education that address concerns about SCD for relevant populations.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3