Charaterizing RDF graphs through graph-based measures – framework and assessment

Author:

Zloch Matthäus12,Acosta Maribel34,Hienert Daniel1,Conrad Stefan2,Dietze Stefan12

Affiliation:

1. GESIS – Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Cologne, Germany. E-mails: matthaeus.zloch@gesis.org, daniel.hienert@gesis.org, stefan.dietze@gesis.org

2. Institute DBS, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany. E-mails: matthaeus.zloch@hhu.de, stefan.conrad@uni-duesseldorf.de, stefan.dietze@hhu.de

3. Institute AIFB, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. E-mail: maribel.acosta@kit.edu

4. Center of Computer Science, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. E-mail: maribel.acosta@rub.de

Abstract

The topological structure of RDF graphs inherently differs from other types of graphs, like social graphs, due to the pervasive existence of hierarchical relations (TBox), which complement transversal relations (ABox). Graph measures capture such particularities through descriptive statistics. Besides the classical set of measures established in the field of network analysis, such as size and volume of the graph or the type of degree distribution of its vertices, there has been some effort to define measures that capture some of the aforementioned particularities RDF graphs adhere to. However, some of them are redundant, computationally expensive, and not meaningful enough to describe RDF graphs. In particular, it is not clear which of them are efficient metrics to capture specific distinguishing characteristics of datasets in different knowledge domains (e.g., Cross Domain vs. Linguistics). In this work, we address the problem of identifying a minimal set of measures that is efficient, essential (non-redundant), and meaningful. Based on 54 measures and a sample of 280 graphs of nine knowledge domains from the Linked Open Data Cloud, we identify an essential set of 13 measures, having the capacity to describe graphs concisely. These measures have the capacity to present the topological structures and differences of datasets in established knowledge domains.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference36 articles.

1. Profiling and mining RDF data with ProLOD++

2. Linked Data Profiling

3. powerlaw: A Python Package for Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Distributions

4. D. Bachlechner and T. Strang, Is the Semantic Web a small world? in: Second International Conference on Internet Technologies and Applications – ITA 2007, 2007, pp. 413–422. https://elib.dlr.de/47899/.

5. RDF dataset profiling – a survey of features;Ben Ellefi;Methods, Vocabularies and Applications, Semantic Web journal,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3