Abstract
Despite citizen calls for agile government, public service organizations often default to hierarchy and adopt dual structure organization designs combining agile and non-agile units. However, ensuring effective collaboration and avoiding accountability challenges at the interface of line and agile units remains a vexing issue. Although accountability is implicitly assumed in agile organizing, it is not readily manifested or experienced. Through this interpretive case study of a public service organization in the Nordics, we examine through the lens of felt accountability, the reaction and roles of line managers to emergent accountability challenges precipitated by parallel maintenance of agile and non-agile unit combinations.
Reference43 articles.
1. Aleksovska, M., Schillemans, T., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2019). Lessons from five decades of experimental and behavioral research on accountability: A systematic literature review. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2(2).
2. When agile harms learning and innovation: (and What Can Be Done About It);Annosi;California Management Review,2020
3. The evolution of line managers during agile transformation: From missionaries to priests;Annosi;California Management Review,2023
4. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations;Battilana;Academy of Management Journal,2017
5. Institutional challenges in agile adoption: Evidence from a public sector IT project;Baxter;Government Information Quarterly,2023